Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649255›Full record

ArticleMolecular plant2023

Comparative and population genomics of buckwheat species reveal key determinants of flavor and fertility.

Kaixuan Zhang, Yuqi He, Xiang Lu, Yaliang Shi, Hui Zhao, Xiaobo Li, Jinlong Li, Yang Liu, Yinan Ouyang, Yu Tang and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular plant, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. EfficientInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 12 institutions in 7 countries.

Kaixuan ZhangInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Yuqi HeInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Xiang LuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Yaliang ShiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Hui ZhaoInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China; College of Agronomy, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu 611130, China.
Xiaobo LiAnnoroad Gene Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing 100176, China.
Jinlong LiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Yang LiuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Yinan OuyangInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Yu TangInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China.
Xue RenAnnoroad Gene Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing 100176, China.
Xuemei ZhangAnnoroad Gene Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing 100176, China.
Weifei YangAnnoroad Gene Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd, Beijing 100176, China.
Zhaoxia SunCollege of Agriculture, Institute of Agricultural Bioengineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi, China; Shanxi Key Laboratory of Minor Crops Germplasm Innovation and Molecular Breeding, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China.
Chunhua ZhangTongliao Institute Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences, Tongliao 028015, Inner Mongolia, China.
Muriel QuinetGroupe de Recherche en Physiologie Végétale (GRPV), Earth and Life Institute-Agronomy (ELI-A), Université Catholique de Louvain, Croix du Sud 4-5, boîte L7.07.13, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Zlata LutharBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mateja GermBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivan KreftBiotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; Nutrition Institute, Tržaška 40, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Dagmar JanovskáGene Bank, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská 507, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
Vladimir MegličAgricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Barbara PipanAgricultural Institute of Slovenia, Hacquetova ulica, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Milen I GeorgievLaboratory of Metabolomics, Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Plovdiv, Bulgaria; Center of Plant Systems Biology and Biotechnology, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Bruno StuderMolecular Plant Breeding, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, ETH Zurich, Universitaetstrasse 2, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland.
Mark A ChapmanBiological Sciences, University of Southampton, Life Sciences Building 85, Highfield Campus, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Meiliang ZhouInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, National Crop Genebank Building, Zhongguancun South Street No. 12, Haidian District, Beijing 100081, China. Electronic address: zhoumeiliang@caas.cn.
Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNAnnoroad Gene Technology (China) · CNUniversity of Ljubljana · SIAgricultural institute of Slovenia · SIBulgarian Academy of Sciences · BGCzech Agrifood Research Center · CZETH Zurich · CHShanxi Agricultural University · CNSichuan Agricultural University · CNTongliao Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNUCLouvain · BEUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum) is an ancient crop with a world-wide distribution. Due to its excellent nutritional quality and high economic and ecological value, common buckwheat is becoming increasingly important throughout the world. The availability of a high-quality reference genome sequence and population genomic data will accelerate the breeding of common buckwheat, but the high heterozygosity due to the outcrossing nature has greatly hindered the genome assembly. Here we report the assembly of a chromosome-scale high-quality reference genome of F. esculentum var. homotropicum, a homozygous self-pollinating variant of common buckwheat. Comparative genomics revealed that two cultivated buckwheat species, common buckwheat (F. esculentum) and Tartary buckwheat (F. tataricum), underwent metabolomic divergence and ecotype differentiation. The expansion of several gene families in common buckwheat, including FhFAR genes, is associated with its wider distribution than Tartary buckwheat. Copy number variation of genes involved in the metabolism of flavonoids is associated with the difference of rutin content between common and Tartary buckwheat. Furthermore, we present a comprehensive atlas of genomic variation based on whole-genome resequencing of 572 accessions of common buckwheat. Population and evolutionary genomics reveal genetic variation associated with environmental adaptability and floral development between Chinese and non-Chinese cultivated groups. Genome-wide association analyses of multi-year agronomic traits with the content of flavonoids revealed that Fh05G014970 is a potential major regulator of flowering period, a key agronomic trait controlling the yield of outcrossing crops, and that Fh06G015130 is a crucial gene underlying flavor-associated flavonoids. Intriguingly, we found that the gene translocation and sequence variation of FhS-ELF3 contribute to the homomorphic self-compatibility of common buckwheat. Collectively, our results elucidate the genetic basis of speciation, ecological adaptation, fertility, and unique flavor of common buckwheat, and provide new resources for future genomics-assisted breeding of this economically important crop.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsFagopyrumDNA Copy Number VariationsFertilityGenome-Wide Association StudyMetagenomicsPlant BreedingBiological ProductsadaptationbuckwheatFagopyrumflavonoidsgenomicsnatural variation

Identifiers

PMID37649255
PMCPMC10512774
OpenAlexW4386295445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.