ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2023
Removal of site effects and enhancement of signal using dual projection independent component analysis for pooling multi-site MRI data.
Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- A linked independent component analysis framework for characterizing site-effect patterns in multi-site structural and functional MRI.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A data integration method for new advances in development cognitive neuroscience.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Combining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data from multi-site studies is a popular approach for constructing larger datasets to greatly enhance the reliability and reproducibility of neuroscience research. However, the scanner/site variability is a significant confound that complicates the interpretation of the results, so effective and complete removal of the scanner/site variability is necessary to realise the full advantages of pooling multi-site datasets. Independent component analysis (ICA) and general linear model (GLM) based harmonisation methods are the two primary methods used to eliminate scanner/site effects. Unfortunately, there are challenges with both ICA-based and GLM-based harmonisation methods to remove site effects completely when the signals of interest and scanner/site effects-related variables are correlated, which may occur in neuroscience studies. In this study, we propose an effective and powerful harmonisation strategy that implements dual projection (DP) theory based on ICA to remove the scanner/site effects more completely. This method can separate the signal effects correlated with site variables from the identified site effects for removal without losing signals of interest. Both simulations and vivo structural MRI datasets, including a dataset from Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange II and a travelling subject dataset from the Strategic Research Program for Brain Sciences, were used to test the performance of a DP-based ICA harmonisation method. Results show that DP-based ICA harmonisation has superior performance for removing site effects and enhancing the sensitivity to detect signals of interest as compared with GLM-based and conventional ICA harmonisation methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.