Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649120›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2023

Children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children.

Osman Bozkurt, Betul Kocaadam-Bozkurt, Eda Köksal, Funda Seher Özalp Ateş

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07289425 (The Effect of a Mobile Application Developed for Obese Children on Eating Attitudes, Eating Awareness, and Healthy Eating Self-Efficacy), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07289425 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of a Mobile Application Developed for Obese Children on Eating Attitudes, Eating Awareness, and Healthy Eating Self-Efficacy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCumhuriyet UniversityRan2026 to 2027Enrolled52ConditionsObesity, Child HealthArmsChildhood Obesity Mobile Application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Osman BozkurtDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey. dytosmanbozkurt@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5829-7543
Betul Kocaadam-BozkurtDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9058-4630
Eda KöksalDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Gazi University Faculty of Health Sciences, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7930-9910
Funda Seher Özalp AteşDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, 45030, Manisa, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0475-7612
Erzurum Technical University · TRGazi University · TRManisa Celal Bayar University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the children's eating attitudes test (ChEAT) in Turkish children.

methodsThe participants were 331 children (137 boys and 194 girls, ages 8-15). Data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire containing socio-demographic characteristics, the ChEAT, and the children's eating behaviour questionnaire (CEBQ). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to determine the factor structure of the Turkish version of the ChEAT. Additionally, the reliability was examined in terms of internal consistency and test-retest reliability. All statistical analyses were performed using Mplus Trial Version and SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

resultsAccording to the goodness-of-fit statistic, a three-factor solution was appropriate and compatible with clinical considerations. The three factors explained 50.1% of the variance. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.75 for ChEAT-26, 0.67 for "Preoccupation with thinness and food", 0.63 for "Social pressure to eat", and 0.71 for "Dieting". Furthermore, the test-retest reliability was 0.72, 0.62, 0.59, and 0.59 respectively. Statistically significant correlations between the ChEAT and CEBQ were found (p < 0.05). "Preoccupation with thinness and food" was significantly higher in obese children (p < 0.05), while "Social pressure to eat" was lower (p < 0.001). Sex, grade, BMI, parental education in addition to working status affected the ChEAT-26 scores.

conclusionsThe present study has provided preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the ChEAT.

Indexed as

Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT)ReliabilityTurkish childrenValidation

Identifiers

PMID37649120
PMCPMC10469453
OpenAlexW4386278335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.