Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649111›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research: a scoping review of contemporary practice.

Kristine Elberg Dengsø, Sofie Tscherning Lindholm, Suzanne Forsyth Herling, Maja Pedersen, Kristina Holmegaard Nørskov, Marie Oxenbøll Collet, Iben Husted Nielsen, Mille Guldager Christiansen, Mette Schaufuss Engedal, Helga Wallin Moen and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Bridging Lived and Expert Experience: A Qualitative Study Exploring Lived-Experience Experts' and Researchers' Experiences of Public Engagement in Cancer Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Perceptions on healthy aging: insights from focus group interviews of older adults in Sweden.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristine Elberg Dengsø *Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark. Kristine.elberg.dengsoe@regionh.dk.
Sofie Tscherning Lindholm *Centre for Cancer and Organ Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Suzanne Forsyth HerlingDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Maja PedersenDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Kristina Holmegaard NørskovDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Marie Oxenbøll ColletDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Iben Husted NielsenDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Mille Guldager ChristiansenDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Mette Schaufuss EngedalDepartment of Hematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Helga Wallin MoenCentre of Diaconia and Professional Practice, VID Specialized University, Oslo, Norway.
Karin PiilDepartment of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Ingrid EgerodDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Mogens HørderDepartment of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mary JardenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø, Denmark.
Copenhagen University Hospital · DKRigshospitalet · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKVID Specialized University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver the past decades, there has been a growing international interest in user involvement in healthcare research. However, evidence on the management and impact of patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research remains limited.

objectiveThe aim was to explore and delineate the current state, practice, and impact of patient and public involvement in healthcare research across different areas of healthcare and patient populations in the Nordic countries.

methodsWe conducted a scoping review using nine scientific databases and gray literature from 1992-2023. Sources were categorized as empirical or non-empirical. We used the Guidance for Reporting Involvement of Patients and the Public Short Form 2 checklist for reporting of patient and public involvement in healthcare research and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

resultsA total of 56 publications were included, consisting of 39 empirical and 17 non-empirical sources. Gray literature varied among countries and institutions encompassing different types of documents. We found an increase in the number of publications on patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research. This was evidenced by the growing number of references and institutional initiatives intended at involving the public, indicating the increasing emphasis on patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research. The terminology used to describe patient and public involvement varied over time. However, there has been a gradual narrowing down of terms as the concept of PPI has become more integrated into research practices, particularly with the involvement of funding agencies.

conclusionThe utilization of patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research has substantially increased, proliferated, and gained widespread acceptance across diverse healthcare domains. The variety of approaches challenged our scoping review in terms of systematic description and impact. Patient and public involvement was applied in one or more research stages using different methodologies and terms. International agreement on terms and definitions is needed for reliable interpretation of the use of patient and public involvement in Nordic healthcare research.

Identifiers

PMID37649111
PMCPMC10466765
OpenAlexW4386294778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.