Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649107›Full record

Observational studyAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2023

Factors associated with hand washing effectiveness: an institution-based observational study.

Chen Shi, Margaret O'Donoghue, Lin Yang, Hilda Tsang, Jing Chen, Jing Zou, Jing Qin, Yim-Wah Mak, Didier Pittet, Yao Jie Xie and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chen ShiSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Margaret O'DonoghueSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Lin YangSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China. l.yang@polyu.edu.hk.
Hilda TsangSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Jing ChenSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Jing ZouSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Jing QinSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Yim-Wah MakSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Didier PittetFaculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yao Jie XieSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Timothy LaiSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Chen LiDepartment of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.
Jiannong CaoDepartment of Computing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have investigated how the effectiveness of hand washing in removing hand contaminants is influenced by the performance and duration of each step involved. We conducted an observational study by recruiting participants from a university campus, with the aim to comprehensively evaluate how performance, duration and demographic factors influence hand washing effectiveness.

methodsA total of 744 videos were collected from 664 participants in July-October 2022 and independently evaluated by two infection control experts through labelling videos for correct and incorrect performance of each step. The individual hand washing effectiveness was determined by quantifying the percentage of residual fluorescent gel on the dorsum and palm areas of each participant's hands. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors that were significantly associated with better hand washing effectiveness. An exposure-response relationship was constructed to identify optimal durations for each step. Approximately 2300 hand images were processed using advanced normalization algorithms and overlaid to visualize the areas with more fluorescence residuals after hand washing.

resultsStep 3 (rub between fingers) was the most frequently omitted step and step 4 (rub the dorsum of fingers) was the most frequently incorrectly performed step. After adjustment for covariates, sex, performance of step 4 and step 7 (rub wrists), rubbing hands during rinsing, and rinsing time were significantly associated with hand washing effectiveness. The optimal overall hand washing time was 31 s from step 1 to step 7, and 28 s from step 1 to step 6, with each step ideally lasting 4-5 s, except step 3. The palms of both hands had less fluorescence residuals than the dorsums. The areas where residuals most likely appeared were wrists, followed by finger tips, finger webs and thumbs.

conclusionsPerformance and duration of some hand washing steps, sex and rinsing time were associated with hand washing effectiveness. The optimal duration might be applied to all seven steps to achieve the best decontamination results. Further studies are needed to refine hand hygiene standards and enhance compliance.

Indexed as

Hand DisinfectionHand HygieneFluorescenceHandHealth FacilitiesHumansHand hygieneHand washingInfection prevention and controlStandards

Identifiers

PMID37649107
PMCPMC10469426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.