Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649106›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2023

Can ChatGPT explain it? Use of artificial intelligence in multiple sclerosis communication.

Hernan Inojosa, Stephen Gilbert, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Undine Proschmann, Katja Akgün, Tjalf Ziemssen

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mechanistic Insights into the Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Management of Multiple Sclerosis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
  2. From lesion detection to outcome prediction: artificial intelligence and deep learning applications in multiple sclerosis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hernan InojosaCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Univesität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Stephen GilbertElse Kröner-Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kröner-Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Undine ProschmannCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Univesität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Katja AkgünCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Univesität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.
Tjalf ZiemssenCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Univesität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. tjalf.ziemssen@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-8202

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID37649106
PMCPMC10469796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.