Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37649098›Full record

ArticleResearch involvement and engagement2023

Evaluating the impacts of patient engagement on a national health research network: results of a case study of the Chronic Pain Network.

Laura Tripp, Dawn P Richards, Jennifer Daly-Cyr, Therese Lane, Delane Linkiewich, Kimberly N Begley, Norman Buckley, Maria Hudspith, Patricia Poulin, Julia Abelson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research involvement and engagement, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Establishing a Public Involvement Network for Chronic Pain Research in the United Kingdom: Lessons Learned.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Importance of Lived Experience: A Scoping Review on the Value of Patient and Public Involvement in Health Research.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Laura TrippPublic and Patient Engagement Collaborative, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. lauratripp@mcmaster.ca.
Dawn P RichardsChronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jennifer Daly-CyrChronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Therese LaneChronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Delane LinkiewichChronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Kimberly N BegleyChronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Norman BuckleyChronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Maria HudspithChronic Pain Network, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Patricia PoulinThe Ottawa Hospital Pain Clinic, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Julia AbelsonDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
McMaster University · CAGlycemic Index Laboratories · CAImpact · CAUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Chronic Pain Network (CPN) is a pan-Canadian research network focused on innovating and improving the quality and delivery of pain prevention, assessment, management and research for all Canadians. An important focus of the CPN is to work in collaboration with patient partners. Patient partners, researchers and clinicians work together in all aspects of the research network including on funded research projects and in the governance of the Network. Given this focus, the CPN identified the importance of evaluating their patient engagement work to understand its functioning and impact.

methodsThe objective of this exploratory evaluation case study was to understand the impacts of patient engagement on the CPN. The CPN worked with an external evaluation team which established an arms-length approach to the evaluation. Interviews were conducted with CPN members, including patient partners, leadership, funded researchers and committee co-chairs, at three discrete time points to trace the evolution of the patient engagement program within the Network. Key Network documents were also collected and reviewed. Data were analyzed following each set of interviews using content analysis guided by the principles of constant comparison and qualitative description. A final round of analysis was conducted using the Engage with Impact Toolkit, an impact measurement framework, to identify impacts of engagement.

resultsImpacts of patient engagement were identified at the individual, network, funded research project and research community levels. These impacts were observed in the following areas: (1) building community; (2) developing knowledge, skills and resources; (3) increasing confidence; (4) influencing priorities and decisions; (5) enabling additional opportunities; (6) promoting culture change; and, (7) coping with experiences of living with chronic pain.

conclusionsWhile not without challenges, the patient engagement efforts of the CPN demonstrates the impact engaging patient partners can have on a national research network and related policy activities. Understanding the approaches to, and impacts of, patient engagement on health research networks can illuminate the value of having patient partners engaged in all aspects of a research network and should serve as encouragement to others who look to take on similar work.

Indexed as

EvaluationPatient and public involvementPatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID37649098
PMCPMC10466858
OpenAlexW4386289683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.