ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2024
Addition of bioimpedance-derived body cell mass improves performance of serum creatinine-based GFR estimation in a chronic kidney disease cohort.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review Evaluating Estimated GFR Performance in South Asian Populations.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSerum creatinine-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimating equations are imprecise and systemic overestimate GFR in chronic kidney disease (CKD) populations with low muscle mass. Bioimpedance devices can measure body cell mass (BCM), a surrogate for muscle mass which has been included in a published GFR estimating equation. This BCM GFR equation is validated and compared with MDRD and CKD-EPI 2021 equations in an Indian CKD population.
methodsPatients with stable CKD stages 1-5 and voluntary kidney donors underwent measurement of serum creatinine, DTPA GFR and bioimpedance on the same day. BCM GFR was tested for consistency, agreement and performance with respect to DTPA GFR.
resultsA total of 125 study participants were enrolled, including 106 patients with CKD (Stage 1: 8; stage 2: 32, stage 3: 42, stage 4: 20 and stage 5: 4 patients) and 19 voluntary kidney donors, with 66% males, and a mean age of 43.3 (± 16.5) years. The median bias of BCM GFR was 5.45 ml/min/1.73 m2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.2-8.3], absolute precision was 10.16 ml/min/1.73 m
conclusionBCM-based GFR estimating equation performed better than MDRD and CKD-EPI equations in this Indian CKD population, and BCM GFR-based KDIGO staging was associated with lesser misclassification than the MDRD and CKD-EPI equations. TRIAL REGISTRATION (PROSPECTIVE): Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI/2019/11/021850).
Indexed as
Identifiers
37648874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.