Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37648800›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Selective UMLS knowledge infusion for biomedical question answering.

Hyeryun Park, Jiye Son, Jeongwon Min, Jinwook Choi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hyeryun ParkInterdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jiye SonInterdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeongwon MinInterdisciplinary Program for Bioengineering, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jinwook ChoiIntegrated Major in Innovative Medical Science, Seoul National University Graduate School, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jinchoi@snu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the artificial intelligence applications in the biomedical field is knowledge-intensive question-answering. As domain expertise is particularly crucial in this field, we propose a method for efficiently infusing biomedical knowledge into pretrained language models, ultimately targeting biomedical question-answering. Transferring all semantics of a large knowledge graph into the entire model requires too many parameters, increasing computational cost and time. We investigate an efficient approach that leverages adapters to inject Unified Medical Language System knowledge into pretrained language models, and we question the need to use all semantics in the knowledge graph. This study focuses on strategies of partitioning knowledge graph and either discarding or merging some for more efficient pretraining. According to the results of three biomedical question answering finetuning datasets, the adapters pretrained on semantically partitioned group showed more efficient performance in terms of evaluation metrics, required parameters, and time. The results also show that discarding groups with fewer concepts is a better direction for small datasets, and merging these groups is better for large dataset. Furthermore, the metric results show a slight improvement, demonstrating that the adapter methodology is rather insensitive to the group formulation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceUnified Medical Language SystemBenchmarkingKnowledgeLanguage

Identifiers

PMID37648800
PMCPMC10468517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.