ArticleScientific reports2023
Selective UMLS knowledge infusion for biomedical question answering.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One of the artificial intelligence applications in the biomedical field is knowledge-intensive question-answering. As domain expertise is particularly crucial in this field, we propose a method for efficiently infusing biomedical knowledge into pretrained language models, ultimately targeting biomedical question-answering. Transferring all semantics of a large knowledge graph into the entire model requires too many parameters, increasing computational cost and time. We investigate an efficient approach that leverages adapters to inject Unified Medical Language System knowledge into pretrained language models, and we question the need to use all semantics in the knowledge graph. This study focuses on strategies of partitioning knowledge graph and either discarding or merging some for more efficient pretraining. According to the results of three biomedical question answering finetuning datasets, the adapters pretrained on semantically partitioned group showed more efficient performance in terms of evaluation metrics, required parameters, and time. The results also show that discarding groups with fewer concepts is a better direction for small datasets, and merging these groups is better for large dataset. Furthermore, the metric results show a slight improvement, demonstrating that the adapter methodology is rather insensitive to the group formulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.