ArticleScientific reports2023
SNR enhanced high-speed two-photon microscopy using a pulse picker and time gating detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spectroscopic Super-resolution Imaging of DNA Molecules using Intrinsic Contrast.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2026Article
- Selecting the optimal cell migration assay: fundamentals and practical guidelines.Nature methods · 2026Review
- More than double the fun with two-photon excitation microscopy.Communications biology · 2024Review
- Simultaneous label-free autofluorescence multi-harmonic microscopy driven by the supercontinuum generated from a bulk nonlinear crystal.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two-photon microscopy (TPM) is an attractive biomedical imaging method due to its large penetration depth and optical sectioning capability. In particular, label-free autofluorescence imaging offers various advantages for imaging biological samples. However, relatively low intensity of autofluorescence leads to low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), causing practical challenges for imaging biological samples. In this study, we present TPM using a pulse picker to utilize low pulse repetition rate of femtosecond pulsed laser to increase the pulse peak power of the excitation source leading to higher emission of two-photon fluorescence with the same average illumination power. Stronger autofluorescence emission allowed us to obtain higher SNR images of arterial and liver tissues. In addition, by applying the time gating detection method to the pulse signals obtained by TPM, we were able to significantly reduce the background noise of two-photon images. As a result, our TPM system using the pulsed light source with a 19 times lower repetition rate allowed us to obtain the same SNR image more than 19 times faster with the same average power. Although high pulse energy can increase the photobleaching, we also observed that high-speed imaging with low total illumination energy can mitigate the photobleaching effect to a level similar to that of conventional illumination with a high repetition rate. We anticipate that this simple approach will provide guidance for SNR enhancement with high-speed imaging in TPM as well as other nonlinear microscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.