Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37648737›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Critical dynamics arise during structured information presentation within embodied in vitro neuronal networks.

Forough Habibollahi, Brett J Kagan, Anthony N Burkitt, Chris French

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Heavy-tailed update distributions arise from information-driven self-organization in nonequilibrium learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Harnessing Intelligence from Brain Cells In Vitro.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2025
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Forough Habibollahi *Cortical Labs Pty Ltd, Melbourne, 3056, VIC, Australia.
Brett J Kagan *Cortical Labs Pty Ltd, Melbourne, 3056, VIC, Australia. brett@corticallabs.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3355-7553
Anthony N BurkittBiomedical Engineering Department, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5672-2772
Chris FrenchNeural Dynamics Laboratory, Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Parkville, 3010, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1445-8704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how brains process information is an incredibly difficult task. Amongst the metrics characterising information processing in the brain, observations of dynamic near-critical states have generated significant interest. However, theoretical and experimental limitations associated with human and animal models have precluded a definite answer about when and why neural criticality arises with links from attention, to cognition, and even to consciousness. To explore this topic, we used an in vitro neural network of cortical neurons that was trained to play a simplified game of 'Pong' to demonstrate Synthetic Biological Intelligence (SBI). We demonstrate that critical dynamics emerge when neural networks receive task-related structured sensory input, reorganizing the system to a near-critical state. Additionally, better task performance correlated with proximity to critical dynamics. However, criticality alone is insufficient for a neuronal network to demonstrate learning in the absence of additional information regarding the consequences of previous actions. These findings offer compelling support that neural criticality arises as a base feature of incoming structured information processing without the need for higher order cognition.

Indexed as

CognitionNeuronsAnimalsBenchmarkingBrainConsciousnessHumans

Identifiers

PMID37648737
PMCPMC10469171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.