Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37648728›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Fibroglandular tissue segmentation in breast MRI using vision transformers: a multi-institutional evaluation.

Gustav Müller-Franzes, Fritz Müller-Franzes, Luisa Huck, Vanessa Raaff, Eva Kemmer, Firas Khader, Soroosh Tayebi Arasteh, Teresa Lemainque, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Sven Nebelung and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gustav Müller-FranzesDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Fritz Müller-FranzesDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Luisa HuckDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Vanessa RaaffDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Eva KemmerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Firas KhaderDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Soroosh Tayebi ArastehDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Teresa LemainqueDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Jakob Nikolas KatherElse Kroener Fresenius Center for Digital Health, Technical University, Dresden, Germany.
Sven NebelungDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Christiane KuhlDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany.
Daniel TruhnDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital RWTH, Aachen, Germany. dtruhn@ukaachen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and automatic segmentation of fibroglandular tissue in breast MRI screening is essential for the quantification of breast density and background parenchymal enhancement. In this retrospective study, we developed and evaluated a transformer-based neural network for breast segmentation (TraBS) in multi-institutional MRI data, and compared its performance to the well established convolutional neural network nnUNet. TraBS and nnUNet were trained and tested on 200 internal and 40 external breast MRI examinations using manual segmentations generated by experienced human readers. Segmentation performance was assessed in terms of the Dice score and the average symmetric surface distance. The Dice score for nnUNet was lower than for TraBS on the internal testset (0.909 ± 0.069 versus 0.916 ± 0.067, P < 0.001) and on the external testset (0.824 ± 0.144 versus 0.864 ± 0.081, P = 0.004). Moreover, the average symmetric surface distance was higher (= worse) for nnUNet than for TraBS on the internal (0.657 ± 2.856 versus 0.548 ± 2.195, P = 0.001) and on the external testset (0.727 ± 0.620 versus 0.584 ± 0.413, P = 0.03). Our study demonstrates that transformer-based networks improve the quality of fibroglandular tissue segmentation in breast MRI compared to convolutional-based models like nnUNet. These findings might help to enhance the accuracy of breast density and parenchymal enhancement quantification in breast MRI screening.

Indexed as

Breast DensityMagnetic Resonance ImagingElectric Power SuppliesHumansRadiographyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37648728
PMCPMC10468506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.