Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37648662›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2023

De Novo Mutation Rates in Sticklebacks.

Chaowei Zhang, Kerry Reid, Arthur F Sands, Antoine Fraimout, Mikkel Heide Schierup, Juha Merilä

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Effect of methylation on genome mutability in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Census and genetic analysis of the United States marmoset population.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Chaowei ZhangArea of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0003-4641-1756
Kerry ReidArea of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0001-5653-9935
Arthur F SandsArea of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0003-0966-421X
Antoine FraimoutArea of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0003-4552-3553
Mikkel Heide SchierupBioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-1790
Juha MeriläArea of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID 0000-0001-9614-0072
University of Hong Kong · HKUniversity of Helsinki · FIAarhus University · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutation rate is a fundamental parameter in population genetics. Apart from being an important scaling parameter for demographic and phylogenetic inference, it allows one to understand at what rate new genetic diversity is generated and what the expected level of genetic diversity is in a population at equilibrium. However, except for well-established model organisms, accurate estimates of de novo mutation rates are available for a very limited number of organisms from the wild. We estimated mutation rates (µ) in two marine populations of the nine-spined stickleback (Pungitius pungitius) with the aid of several 2- and 3-generational family pedigrees, deep (>50×) whole-genome resequences and a high-quality reference genome. After stringent filtering, we discovered 308 germline mutations in 106 offspring translating to µ = 4.83 × 10-9 and µ = 4.29 × 10-9 per base per generation in the two populations, respectively. Up to 20% of the mutations were shared by full-sibs showing that the level of parental mosaicism was relatively high. Since the estimated µ was 3.1 times smaller than the commonly used substitution rate, recalibration with µ led to substantial increase in estimated divergence times between different stickleback species. Our estimates of the de novo mutation rate should provide a useful resource for research focused on fish population genetics and that of sticklebacks in particular.

Indexed as

SmegmamorphaAnimalsGerm-Line MutationMutationMutation RatePhylogenydivergence timegenetic diversitygermline mutation ratemutation rateninespine stickleback

Identifiers

PMID37648662
PMCPMC10503787
OpenAlexW4386305193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.