Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37648458›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of veterinary medical science2023

Antimicrobial usage surveys using electronic medical records in cattle practice in Gifu Prefecture.

Yasuyo Terashi, Yoshikazu Hirata, Tetsuo Asai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of veterinary medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasuyo TerashiGifu Prefectural Chuo Livestock Hygiene Service Center, Gifu, Japan.
Yoshikazu HirataGifu Livestock Insurance Scheme (NOSAI Gifu), Gifu, Japan.
Tetsuo AsaiDepartment of Applied Veterinary Science, the United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the majority of antimicrobial treatments for cattle in Japan are prescribed by veterinarians, medical record information can be useful in clarifying the amount and purpose of antimicrobial use. In this study, we examined their amount and purpose in cattle practices in Gifu Prefecture. In cattle, approximately 85% of the antimicrobials are used for the treatment of gastrointestinal (50.4%) and respiratory diseases (34.4%). The main antimicrobials were sulfonamides (27.1 kg, 49.2%), followed by amphenicols (11.9 kg, 21.7%). As for second-line antimicrobials for veterinary treatment, fluoroquinolones, a third-generation cephalosporins, and 15 membered-ring macrolides, accounted for 5.6%, 0.1%, and 0.9% of all antimicrobials, respectively. Thus, medical record information may represent the actual situation of not only antimicrobial use, but also the significance of the disease in local regions.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsElectronic Health RecordsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCattleFluoroquinolonesSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsFluoroquinolonesantimicrobial usecattlemedical record

Identifiers

PMID37648458
PMCPMC10600527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.