ArticleOpen heart2023
Ancestral diversity in lipoprotein(a) studies helps address evidence gaps.
Article in Open heart, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lp(a) Has Specific Effects on Coronary Artery Disease Independent of LDL-C: A Mendelian Randomization Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Recent advances in understanding the spectrum of genetic determinants of lipoprotein(a) levels.Current opinion in lipidology · 2026Review
- Genetic Prediction of Circulating Lipoprotein(a) Levels in Diverse Populations.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Metabolic implications of COVID-19 with a focus on lipid profiles and inflammatory markers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical utility of lipoprotein(a) and the ApoB/ApoA-I ratio in the risk assessment of acute coronary syndrome: from single biomarkers to integrated risk stratification.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- The biology of lipoprotein(a): From genetics to molecular mechanisms.European journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Cardiovascular Implications of Lipoprotein(a) and its Genetic Variants: A Critical Review From the Middle East.JACC. Asia · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe independent and causal cardiovascular disease risk factor lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is elevated in >1.5 billion individuals worldwide, but studies have prioritised European populations.
methodsHere, we examined how ancestrally diverse studies could clarify Lp(a)'s genetic architecture, inform efforts examining application of Lp(a) polygenic risk scores (PRS), enable causal inference and identify unexpected Lp(a) phenotypic effects using data from African (n=25 208), East Asian (n=2895), European (n=362 558), South Asian (n=8192) and Hispanic/Latino (n=8946) populations.
resultsFourteen genome-wide significant loci with numerous population specific signals of large effect were identified that enabled construction of Lp(a) PRS of moderate (R
conclusionsOur results emphasise the merits of prioritising ancestral diversity when addressing Lp(a) evidence gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.