Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37647859›Full record

Observational studyObesity facts2023

Comprehensive Questionnaire in Postpartum Women to Assess Women's Knowledge of the Current Weight Gain Guidelines during Pregnancy in Lower Saxony.

Jennifer Jessica Dickert, Daliah Laura Mbang Springer, Constantin von Kaisenberg, Peter Hillemanns, Martina de Zwaan, Lars Brodowski

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Obesity facts, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer Jessica DickertDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Daliah Laura Mbang SpringerDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Constantin von KaisenbergDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Peter HillemannsDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Martina de ZwaanDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lars BrodowskiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMaternal body mass index and gestational weight gain (GWG) are important factors for maternal and neonatal health. The objective of this study was to assess women's knowledge and examine adherence to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) criteria for weight gain during pregnancy by evaluating the information received from obstetricians and women's knowledge about GWG.

methodsThis is an analytical semi-longitudinal observational study. Weight data from a nonconsecutive convenience sample of 389 women who gave birth at the Hannover Medical School in the period from August 2020 to July 2021 were taken from their maternal records. Immediately after giving birth, the whole collective (n = 389) was asked to participate in a questionnaire study including questions that were taken from the EMat Health Survey inquiring about their knowledge and received information about GWG and about their eating behavior. Here, a subset of 202 women participated.

resultsSixty-five percent of the participants who answered the questionnaire reported that they had not been informed by their obstetrician about GWG recommendations. Additionally, a minority of women knew the correct IOM GWG category based on their pre-pregnancy weight. Meeting the IOM GWG guidelines did not depend on whether or not women received GWG recommendations or knew about the correct GWG category. The majority of women were not concerned about gaining too much weight during pregnancy. 20.7% of all women participating in the study were affected by obesity pre-pregnancy. According to the IOM criteria for GWG, 50.4% gained too much weight. The proportion of women exceeding IOM recommendations was highest in women with pre-pregnancy overweight and obesity (67%). DISCUSSION: Weight gain outside of the IOM recommendations is widespread in our survey. Information received and knowledge about GWG recommendations were inadequate in our sample. Considering the fact that GWG outside recommended ranges can contribute to short- and long-term health complications, especially when a woman enters pregnancy already with overweight or obesity, identifying ways of achieving a healthier GWG is warranted.

Indexed as

OverweightPregnancy ComplicationsBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornObesityPostpartum PeriodPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeSurveys and QuestionnairesWeight GainGestational weight gainPregnancyPre-pregnancy BMIProvider information

Identifiers

PMID37647859
PMCPMC10697741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.