ArticleInternational journal of surgery case reports2023
Acute intestinal obstruction: What if it is instead colonic tuberculosis? What diagnostic and management dilemmas are there?
Article in International journal of surgery case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pseudo-tumoral left-colonic tuberculosis causing acute large-bowel obstruction: a case report and review of the literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and importanceColonic tuberculosis is rare. Clinical, biologic endoscopic and radiological features are not unequivocal. A multitude of differential diagnoses interfere, including Crohn's disease and cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: we present a case of a 48-year-old Tunisian female who complained from occlusive syndrome. For whom none of the various elements of the medical record, the clinical, endoscopic and radiological investigations had enabled a decision to be reached in favor of one diagnosis over the other. Several diagnoses were suggested, including Crohn's disease, neoplastic diseases and, ultimately, colonic tuberculosis, since our country was endemic for this pathology. The collegial decision of the medical staff involved in the management was to operate on the patient. Surgery was required with the intention to treat and mainly to provide histological proof of the disease. A right colectomy allowed histological examination and a diagnosis of colonic tuberculosis. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis should be discussed in patient from endemic countries, who complain chronic abdominal pain, vesperal fever and weight loss for who endoscopy shows the presence of nodules or ulcers. The diagnosis is retained on the basis of pathological findings.
conclusionsBecause of a nonspecific clinical and endoscopic presentations, multiples biopsies even surgical resection are mandatory to rule out differential diagnosis and to confirm the diagnoses of colonic tuberculosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.