Trial reportBlood2023
Sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy in newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML: a randomized, placebo-controlled study by the ALLG.
Trial report in Blood, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of FLT3 inhibitors for acute myeloid leukemia: a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- ELN-DAVID recommendations for NGS-based FLT3-ITD MRD testing for patients with acute myeloid leukemia.Blood · 2026Article
- Comparative efficacy of different therapeutic approaches in treatment naïve FLT3-mutated AML eligible for intensive chemotherapy: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized trials.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Improvements in Real-World Survival in the Setting of a Recent Paradigm Shift in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Treatment.European journal of haematology · 2026Article
- FLT3-ITD MRD in intensive therapy: footprint, not yet the path.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Molecularly targeted therapy and immunotherapy in leukemias.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- FLT3: A 35-Year Voyage from Discovery to the Next Generation of Targeted Therapy in AML.Cancers · 2025Review
- The Combination Therapy With Sorafenib in Therapeutic Strategy of Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Is It Promising? A Narrative Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- CAR-T cell therapy for cancer: current challenges and future directions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- The epigenetic revolution in hematology: from benchside breakthroughs to clinical transformations.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- LST1 expression correlates with immune infiltration and predicts poor prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- [Chinese expert consensus on prevention and treatment of immunotherapeutic and molecular targeted agents-related infections in patients with hematological malignancies (2025)].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2025Article
- Retrospective analysis of sorafenib combined with interferon α-1b, interleukin-2, and thalidomide as maintenance therapy in FLT3-ITD-positive acute myeloid leukemia.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Molecular precision medicine: Multi-omics-based stratification model for acute myeloid leukemia.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Molecular Features and Treatment Paradigms of Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Biomedicines · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sorafenib maintenance improves outcomes after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) for patients with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although promising outcomes have been reported for sorafenib plus intensive chemotherapy, randomized data are limited. This placebo-controlled, phase 2 study (ACTRN12611001112954) randomized 102 patients (aged 18-65 years) 2:1 to sorafenib vs placebo (days 4-10) combined with intensive induction: idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 plus either cytarabine 1.5 g/m2 twice daily on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 (18-55 years) or 100 mg/m2 on days 1 to 7 (56-65 years), followed by consolidation and maintenance therapy for 12 months (post-HCT excluded) in newly diagnosed patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Four patients were excluded in a modified intention-to-treat final analysis (3 not commencing therapy and 1 was FLT3-ITD negative). Rates of complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery were high in both arms (sorafenib, 78%/9%; placebo, 70%/24%). With 49.1-months median follow-up, the primary end point of event-free survival (EFS) was not improved by sorafenib (2-year EFS 47.9% vs 45.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-1.51; P = .61). Two-year overall survival (OS) was 67% in the sorafenib arm and 58% in the placebo arm (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.42-1.39). For patients who received HCT in first remission, the 2-year OS rates were 84% and 67% in the sorafenib and placebo arms, respectively (HR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.18-1.12; P = .08). In exploratory analyses, FLT3-ITD measurable residual disease (MRD) negative status (<0.001%) after induction was associated with improved 2-year OS (83% vs 60%; HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.17-0.93; P = .028). In conclusion, routine use of pretransplant sorafenib plus chemotherapy in unselected patients with FLT3-ITD AML is not supported by this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.