Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37647549›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2023

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-Related False-Positive of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: The Achilles' Heel of Biopsy-Free Radical Prostatectomy?

Wei Tang, Yongxiang Tang, Lin Qi, Ye Zhang, Guyu Tang, Xiaomei Gao, Shuo Hu, Yi Cai

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06494696 (Utilizing 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI Imaging in Conjunction With mpMRI for Evaluating Prospective Prostate Cancer Risk), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06494696 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Utilizing 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI Imaging in Conjunction With mpMRI for Evaluating Prospective Prostate Cancer Risk

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorChang Gung Memorial HospitalRan2024 to 2027Enrolled71ConditionsProstate CancerArmsGa-68 PSMA PET/MRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Prospective evaluation of the PRIMARY score using [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparative Analysis ofAdvances in radiation oncology · 2025
    Article
  7. Pathological and radiological features of false-positive lesions on [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Wei TangDepartment of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7411-3268
Yongxiang TangDepartment of PET Center, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lin QiDepartment of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ye ZhangDepartment of Oncology, NHC Key Laboratory of Cancer Proteomics, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6692-2452
Guyu TangDepartment of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0976-3939
Xiaomei GaoDepartment of Pathology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9247-5825
Shuo HuDepartment of PET Center, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yi CaiDepartment of Urology, Disorders of Prostate Cancer Multidisciplinary Team, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7773-2064
Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRadical prostatectomy is one of the primary treatments for localized clinically significant prostate cancer. Generally, its application is based on prior biopsy. PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen)-PET (positron emission tomography) is considered promising in biopsy-free radical prostatectomy. The expression of PSMA in benign prostatic hyperplasia tissue and corresponding positive reaction are crucial concerns for a no-biopsy strategy. Currently, no study has explored the benign prostatic hyperplasia-related false-positive of PSMA-PET in the detection of prostate cancer. Furthermore, the influence of maximum standardized uptake value and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System on biopsy-free radical prostatectomy is also poorly characterized. MATERIALS AND

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients who received PSMA-PET because of clinical suspicion of prostate cancer and were confirmed to have benign prostatic hyperplasia or prostate cancer. The receiver operating characteristic curve was generated for maximum standardized uptake value. Results of interest were the false-positive rate of PSMA-PET and the efficacy of maximum standardized uptake value or multiparametric MRI in excluding false-positives.

resultsThe benign prostatic hyperplasia-related false-positive rate of PSMA-PET in detecting prostate cancer was 30%. Maximum standardized uptake value could effectively exclude benign prostatic hyperplasia and Grade Group 1 patients with an area under the curve of 0.86; the optimal maximum standardized uptake value cutoff value with 100% specificity was 15, with a sensitivity of 41%. Notably, the sensitivity and specificity of stringent PET score and Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System criteria (both ≥4) in diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer were 49% and 100%, respectively.

conclusionsOur findings revealed benign prostatic hyperplasia-related false-positive rate of PSMA-PET and provided a preliminary reference in biopsy-free radical prostatectomy.

Indexed as

Prostatic HyperplasiaProstatic NeoplasmsBiopsyGallium RadioisotopesHumansMalePositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyProstateProstatectomyRetrospective StudiesGallium Radioisotopesbiopsyfalse positive reactionspositron emission tomography computed tomographyprostatectomyprostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID37647549
OpenAlexW4386274656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.