Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37647274›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Deep learning classification of shoulder fractures on plain radiographs of the humerus, scapula and clavicle.

Martin Magnéli, Petter Ling, Jacob Gislén, Johan Fagrell, Yilmaz Demir, Erica Domeij Arverud, Kristofer Hallberg, Björn Salomonsson, Max Gordon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin MagnéliDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0341-0227
Petter LingDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Jacob GislénDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan FagrellDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yilmaz DemirDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Erica Domeij ArverudDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristofer HallbergDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0006-6617-1963
Björn SalomonssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3437-7290
Max GordonDepartment of Clinical Sciences at Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8080-5815
Karolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we present a deep learning model for fracture classification on shoulder radiographs using a convolutional neural network (CNN). The primary aim was to evaluate the classification performance of the CNN for proximal humeral fractures (PHF) based on the AO/OTA classification system. Secondary objectives included evaluating the model's performance for diaphyseal humerus, clavicle, and scapula fractures. The training dataset consisted of 6,172 examinations, including 2-7 radiographs per examination. The overall area under the curve (AUC) for fracture classification was 0.89, indicating good performance. For PHF classification, 12 out of 16 classes achieved an AUC of 0.90 or greater. Additionally, the CNN model had excellent overall AUC for diaphyseal humerus fractures (0.97), clavicle fractures (0.96), and good AUC for scapula fractures (0.87). Despite the limitations of the study, such as the reliance on ground truth labels provided by students with limited radiographic assessment experience, our findings are in concordance with previous studies, further consolidating CNN as potent fracture classifiers in plain radiographs. The inclusion of multiple radiographs with different views from each examination, as well as the generally unselected nature of the sample, contributed to the overall generalizability of the study. This is the fifth study published by our group on AI in orthopaedic radiographs, which has consistently shown promising results. The next challenge for the orthopaedic research community will be to transfer these results from the research setting into clinical practice. External validation of the CNN model should be conducted in the future before it is considered for use in a clinical setting.

Indexed as

Deep LearningShoulder FracturesThoracic InjuriesClavicleHumansHumerusScapulaShoulder

Identifiers

PMID37647274
PMCPMC10468075
OpenAlexW4386275645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.