Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37647263›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Smartphone ownership, digital literacy, and the mediating role of social connectedness and loneliness in improving the wellbeing of community-dwelling older adults of low socio-economic status in Singapore.

Amrish Soundararajan, Jie Xin Lim, Nerice Heng Wen Ngiam, Angeline Jie-Yin Tey, Aaron Kai Wen Tang, Haikel A Lim, Ka Shing Yow, Ling Jie Cheng, Jess Ho, Qun Xuan Nigel Teo and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Amrish SoundararajanTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-7037-8576
Jie Xin LimTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.
Nerice Heng Wen NgiamTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.
Angeline Jie-Yin TeyTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0001-8958-4476
Aaron Kai Wen TangTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-2631-9437
Haikel A LimTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.
Ka Shing YowTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.
Ling Jie ChengTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.
Jess HoNTUC Health Co-operative Ltd, Singapore, Singapore.
Qun Xuan Nigel TeoPopulation Health and Integrated Care Office, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Wan Qi YeePopulation Health and Integrated Care Office, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Sungwon YoonHealth Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Lian Leng LowPopulation Health and Integrated Care Office, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Kennedy Yao Yi NgTriGen, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, safe-distancing measures resulted in many community-dwelling older adults being socially isolated and lonely, with its attending negative impact on wellbeing and quality of life. While digital technology may have mitigated this, older adults of low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be digitally excluded and hence susceptible to the adverse effects of social isolation and loneliness. This study aims to understand the factors that affect digital literacy, smartphone ownership, and willingness to participate in a digital literacy program (DLP), and to test the hypothesized relations between digital literacy, social connectedness, loneliness, wellbeing, and quality of life amongst community dwelling older adults of low SES. MATERIALS AND

methodsA questionnaire assessing digital literacy, social connectedness, wellbeing and quality of life was administered. Socio-demographic variables, pre-existing internet-enabled, and willingness to participate in a home-based DLP was also collected. Logistic regression was used to identify demographic factors associated with digital literacy, smartphone ownership, and willingness to enroll in a DLP. Serial mediation analysis was also performed using a structural equation model framework.

resultsA total of 302 participants were recruited. Female gender, older age, lower education levels were associated with lower digital literacy. Those who owned a smartphone tended to be younger and better educated. Older adults who were better educated, of Chinese descent (the ethnic majority in Singapore), and who had lower digital literacy, were most willing to enroll in the digital literacy education program. Social-use digital literacy had a positive indirect effect on well-being ([Formula: see text]) and Quality of life ([Formula: see text]), mediated by social connectedness and loneliness. In contrast, instrumental-use digital literacy had a negative indirect effect on well-being ([Formula: see text]) and Quality of life ([Formula: see text]), mediated by social connectedness and loneliness. DISCUSSION: The results suggest there are demographic barriers to participation in DLPs and highlight the benefit of focusing on enhancing social-use digital literacy. Further study is needed to evaluate how well specific interventions to improve social-use digital literacy help to reduce social isolation and loneliness, and ultimately improve wellbeing and quality of life.

Indexed as

COVID-19LonelinessAgedEconomic StatusFemaleHumansIndependent LivingLiteracyOwnershipPandemicsQuality of LifeSingaporeSmartphone

Identifiers

PMID37647263
PMCPMC10468072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.