Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37647251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

More than urns: A multi-method pipeline for analyzing cremation burials.

Lukas Waltenberger, Marjolein D Bosch, Michaela Fritzl, André Gahleitner, Christoph Kurzmann, Maximilian Piniel, Roderick B Salisbury, Ladislav Strnad, Hannah Skerjanz, Domnika Verdianu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The current state of forensic imaging - post mortem imaging.International journal of legal medicine · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lukas WaltenbergerAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-9670-6117
Marjolein D BoschAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Michaela FritzlAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
André GahleitnerClinical Division of Radiology, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christoph KurzmannClinical Division of Conservative Dentistry, University Clinic of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Maximilian PinielAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Roderick B SalisburyAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-3773-5337
Ladislav StrnadLaboratories of the Geological Institutes, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Hannah SkerjanzAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7507-5408
Domnika VerdianuAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.
Christophe SnoeckMultidisciplinary Archaeological Research Institute, Department of Art Sciences and Archaeology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-3770-4055
Fabian KanzUnit of Forensic Anthropology, Center for Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Katharina Rebay-SalisburyAustrian Archaeological Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0126-8693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burial rites of archaeological populations are frequently interpreted based on cremated remains of the human body and the urn they were deposited in. In comparison to inhumations, information about the deceased is much more limited and dependent on fragmentation, selection of body regions, taphonomic processes, and excavation techniques. So far, little attention has been paid to the context in which urns are buried. In this study, we combined archaeological techniques with anthropology, computed tomography, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geochemistry and isotopic approaches and conducted a detailed analysis on a case study of two Late Bronze Age urns from St. Pölten, Austria (c. 1430 and 1260 cal. BCE). The urns were recovered en-bloc and CT-scanned before the micro-excavation. Osteological and strontium isotope analysis revealed that the cremated remains comprised a young adult female and a child that died at the age of 10-12 years. Both individuals had been subject to physiological stress and were likely local. Animal bones burnt at different temperatures suggested different depositional pathways into the urn and pit as part of the pyre, food offerings, and unintentional settlement debris. Eight wild plant and five crop plant species appeared as part of the local landscape, as food offerings and fire accelerants. Sediment chemistry suggests that pyre remains were deposited around the urns during burial. Multi-element geochemistry, archaeobotany, and zooarchaeology provide insights into the Late Bronze Age environment, the process of cremation, the gathering of bones and final funerary deposition.

Indexed as

CremationAnimalsAnthropologyArchaeologyAustriaBurialChildHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID37647251
PMCPMC10468036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.