ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2023
The Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB).
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sharing approaches in predictive genomics across animals, plants and humans.Nature genetics · 2026Review
- Genome survey and chromosome number determination ofComparative cytogenetics · 2026Article
- Comparison of Genomes of Species fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Genetic and genomic resources for turfgrasses: status, applications, and prospects.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2025Review
- Integration of Repeatome and Cytogenetic Data on Tandem DNAs in a Medicinal PlantInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Review
- Bridging micro and macroevolution: insights from chromosomal dynamics in plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For decades, plant biologists have been interested in the determination and documentation of chromosome numbers for extant taxa. This central cytological character has been used as an important phylogenetic marker and as an indicator for major genomic events such as polyploidy and dysploidy. Due to their significance and the relative ease by which chromosome numbers can be obtained, chromosome numbers have been extensively recorded across the plant kingdom and documented in a wide variety of resources. This makes the collection process a wearing task, often leading to partial data retrieval. In 2015, the Chromosome Counts Database (CCDB) was assembled, being an online unified community resource. This database compiles dozens of different chromosome counts sources, of which a significant portion had been unavailable before in a digitized, searchable format. The vast amount of data assembled in CCDB has already enabled a large number of analyses to examine the evolution of different plant hierarchies, as well as the application of various follow-up analyses, such as ploidy-level inference using chromEvol. CCDB ( http://ccdb.tau.ac.il/ ) encourages data sharing among the botanical community and is expected to continue expanding as additional chromosome numbers are recorded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37646942What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.