CicerSpTEdb2.0: An Upgrade of Cicer Species Transposable Elements Database.

Morad M Mokhtar, Ahmed S Fouad, Haytham M Abd-Elhalim, Achraf El Allali

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Morad M MokhtarAfrican Genome Center, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, Morocco.

Ahmed S FouadBotany and Microbiology Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.

Haytham M Abd-ElhalimAgricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt.

Achraf El AllaliAfrican Genome Center, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, Morocco. Achraf.ELALLALI@um6p.ma.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To meet the critical demand of LTR-RTs data-driven research, we updated the CicerSpTEdb database to version 2.0, which includes more accurate intact LTR-RT elements with annotation of internal domains. We also added the ability to BLAST against TEs of Cicer species. As a result, 3701 intact LTR-RTs were detected in the studied genomes, including 2840 Copia and 861 Gypsy elements. Of the 3701 intact LTR-RTs, 588 were in C. arietinum, including 475 Copia and 113 Gypsy. While 1373 were detected in C. reticulatum, including 1041 Copia and 332 Gypsy. Furthermore, 1740 were found in C. echinospermum, including 1324 Copia and 416 Gypsy. Based on LTR-RT clades, the analysis classified the 3701 identified intact LTR-RTs in the studied genomes as Ale (850), SIRE (740), unknown (455), Ikeros (323), Reina (290), Tork (290), Ivana (282), Tekay (197), Athila (128), TAR (99), CRM (31), and Ogre (16) elements. The newly updated CicerSpTEdb2.0 will be a valuable resource for TEs of Cicer species and their comparative genomics.Database URL: http://cicersptedb.easyomics.org/index.php.

Indexed as

CicerDatabases, FactualDNA Transposable ElementsGenomicsDNA Transposable ElementsCicer speciesDatabaseLTR-retrotransposonsLTR-RT gene chimeraTransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID37646938

DOI10.1186/s13059-016-0924-1

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.