Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646876›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie2024

A systemic review and meta-analysis of pararectus versus ilioinguinal approach for the management of acetabular fractures.

Rajesh Kumar Rajnish, Amit Srivastava, Abhay Elhence, Sandeep Kumar Yadav, Kuldeep Rathor, Saurabh Gupta

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Feasibility study of a robot-assisted endoscopic technique for plate osteosyntheses of the acetabulum and anterior pelvic ring.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rajesh Kumar RajnishDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2080-2612
Amit SrivastavaDepartment of Orthopaedics, University College of Medical Sciences and GTB Hospital, Delhi, India.
Abhay ElhenceDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Sandeep Kumar YadavDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India. drsandeepkyadav@gmail.com.
Kuldeep RathorDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.
Saurabh GuptaDepartment of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe complex anatomy of acetabular fracture needs a surgical approach that can achieve anatomical reduction with fewer complications for the fixation of these fractures. Current literature suggests that both Pararectus (PR) approach and Ilioinguinal (IL) approach can be used for the fixation of these fractures safely. However, superiority of the PR approach over the IL approach is not established. Hence, this meta-analysis aimed to compare the PR versus IL approach. METHODOLOGY: A literature search was performed on five databases Medline/PubMed, Scopus Embase, Cinhal, and Cochrane Library, from the inception to January 14, 2023. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was done for the five eligible studies from the literature search. Individual study characteristics data and outcomes were extracted, and Software version 5.4.1 of Review Manager was used for statistical analysis.

resultsFive articles, one Randomized trial (RCT), and four retrospective articles were included and analyzed in this meta-analysis. PR approach has a shorter surgical time [mean difference (MD) -48.4 with 95% CI -74.49, -22.30; p = 0.0003], less intraoperative blood loss (MD -123.22 with 95% CI -212.28, -34.15; p = 0.007), and smaller surgical incision (MD -9.87 with 95% CI -15.21, -4.52; p = 0.0003) than the IL approach. However, the meta-analysis failed to show a difference between the two surgical approaches concerning the quality of reduction, overall complications, nerve injury, vascular injury, heterotopic ossification, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism.

conclusionThe PR approach has a shorter surgical duration, less blood loss, and a smaller surgical incision than the IL approach. However, both surgical approaches have equivocal results regarding fracture reduction quality, complication rates, and functional outcomes for acetabular fracture fixation. Hence, for acetabular fractures fixation, PR approach can be considered a safe and feasible alternative to the IL approach.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneHip FracturesSpinal FracturesSurgical WoundAcetabulumFracture Fixation, InternalHumansRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcetabular fracturesFracture acetabulumIlioinguinal approachPararectus approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.