Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646851›Full record

ReviewBulletin of mathematical biology2023

Phenotype Control techniques for Boolean gene regulatory networks.

Daniel Plaugher, David Murrugarra

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bulletin of mathematical biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Daniel PlaugherDepartment of Toxicology and Cancer Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. plaugher_dr@uky.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4614-1058
David MurrugarraDepartment of Mathematics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training in Cancer BiologyT32CA165990 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers, KATHLEEN L. O'CONNOR · 2013 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS T32 CA165990NIH HHS T32CA165990
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modeling cell signal transduction pathways via Boolean networks (BNs) has become an established method for analyzing intracellular communications over the last few decades. What's more, BNs provide a course-grained approach, not only to understanding molecular communications, but also for targeting pathway components that alter the long-term outcomes of the system. This has come to be known as phenotype control theory. In this review we study the interplay of various approaches for controlling gene regulatory networks such as: algebraic methods, control kernel, feedback vertex set, and stable motifs. The study will also include comparative discussion between the methods, using an established cancer model of T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocyte Leukemia. Further, we explore possible options for making the control search more efficient using reduction and modularity. Finally, we will include challenges presented such as the complexity and the availability of software for implementing each of these control techniques.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksMathematical ConceptsModels, BiologicalPhenotypeSoftwareBoolean networksDiscrete dynamical systemsNetwork dynamicsPhenotype control theoryRegulatory networks

Identifiers

PMID37646851
PMCPMC10542862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.