Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646804›Full record

ReviewCritical reviews in toxicology2023

International regulatory uses of acute systemic toxicity data and integration of new approach methodologies.

Judy Strickland, Esther Haugabrooks, David G Allen, Luciene B Balottin, Yoko Hirabayashi, Nicole C Kleinstreuer, Hajime Kojima, Claudio Nishizawa, Pilar Prieto, Deborah E Ratzlaff and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical reviews in toxicology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Judy StricklandInotiv, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Esther HaugabrooksPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
David G AllenInotiv, Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Luciene B BalottinNational Institute of Metrology, Quality and Technology (INMETRO), Duque de Caxias, Brazil.
Yoko HirabayashiCenter for Biological Safety and Research, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki, Japan.
Nicole C KleinstreuerDivision of Translational Toxicology, National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
Hajime KojimaJapanese Center for the Validation of Alternative Methods, National Institute of Health Sciences, Kawasaki, Japan.
Claudio NishizawaBrazilian Health Regulatory Agency (ANVISA), Brasilia, Brazil.
Pilar PrietoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Deborah E RatzlaffNew Substances Assessment and Control Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
Jayoung JeongToxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Cheongju-si, South Korea.
JinHee LeeToxicological Evaluation and Research Department, National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, Cheongju-si, South Korea.
Ying YangGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou, China.
Pinpin LinNational Health Research Institutes, Zhunan Town, Taiwan.
Kristie SullivanPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Warren CaseyDivision of Translational Toxicology, National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USNational Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation · KRNational Institute of Health Sciences · JPPhysicians Committee for Responsible Medicine · USResearch Triangle Park Foundation · USGuangdong Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNHealth Canada · CAInstituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Tecnologia · BRJoint Research Centre · ITNational Health Research Institutes · TW

Funding

NIEHS NIH HHS HHSN273201500010C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical regulatory authorities around the world require systemic toxicity data from acute exposures via the oral, dermal, and inhalation routes for human health risk assessment. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for these tests, we reviewed acute systemic toxicity testing requirements for jurisdictions that participate in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM): Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and the USA. The chemical sectors included in our review of each jurisdiction were cosmetics, consumer products, industrial chemicals, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and pesticides. We found acute systemic toxicity data were most often required for hazard assessment, classification, and labeling, and to a lesser extent quantitative risk assessment. Where animal methods were required, animal reduction methods were typically recommended. For many jurisdictions and chemical sectors, non-animal alternatives are not accepted, but several jurisdictions provide guidance to support the use of test waivers to reduce animal use for specific applications. An understanding of international regulatory requirements for acute systemic toxicity testing will inform ICATM's strategy for the development, acceptance, and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with acute toxicity.

Indexed as

Toxicity Tests, AcuteAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesHumansInternational CooperationRisk AssessmentAcute systemic toxicityanimal alternativeshazard classification and risk assessmentlethality testingregulatory toxicology

Identifiers

PMID37646804
PMCPMC10592330
OpenAlexW4386272582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.