Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646801›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

Short and long-term readmission after major emergency abdominal surgery: a prospective Danish study.

Lív Í Soylu, Dunja Kokotovic, Ismail Gögenur, Sarah Ekeloef, Jakob Burcharth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Patterns of patient worry following major emergency abdominal surgery: a 180-day follow-up study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lív Í SoyluDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Emergency Surgical Research Group (EMERGE), Copenhagen University Hospitals - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark. liv.i.soylu@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6025-9737
Dunja KokotovicDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Emergency Surgical Research Group (EMERGE), Copenhagen University Hospitals - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.
Ismail GögenurCenter for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Sarah EkeloefCenter for Surgical Science, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
Jakob BurcharthDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases, Emergency Surgical Research Group (EMERGE), Copenhagen University Hospitals - Herlev and Gentofte, Borgmester Ib Juuls Vej 1, 2730, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMajor emergency abdominal surgery is associated with severe in-hospital complications and loss of performance. After discharge, a substantial fraction of patients are readmitted emergently; however, limited knowledge exists of the long-term consequences. The aim of this study was to examine the risks and causes of short-term (30-day) and long-term (180-day) readmission among patients undergoing major emergency abdominal surgery.

methodsThis study included 504 patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery at the Zealand University Hospital between March 1, 2017, and February 28, 2019. The population was followed from 0 to 180 days after discharge, and detailed readmission information was registered. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the independent risk factors for readmission within 30 and 180 days.

resultsFrom 0 to 30 days after discharge, 161 (31.9%) patients were readmitted emergently, accumulating to 241 (47.8%) patients within 180 days after discharge. The main reasons for short-term readmission were related to the gastrointestinal tract and surgical wounds, whereas long-term readmissions were due to infections, cardiovascular complications, and abdominal pain. Stomal placement was an independent risk factor for short-term readmission, whereas an ASA score of 3 was a risk factor for both short-term and long-term readmission.

conclusionClose to 50% of all patients who underwent major emergency abdominal surgery had one or more emergency readmission within 180 days of discharge, and these data points towards the risk factors involved.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionPostoperative ComplicationsDenmarkHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAbdominal surgeryEmergency surgeryLong-term outcomesReadmissionRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID37646801
PMCPMC10923996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.