Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646753›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

Scaling-up RADseq methods for large datasets of non-invasive samples: Lessons for library construction and data preprocessing.

Larissa S Arantes, Jilda A Caccavo, James K Sullivan, Sarah Sparmann, Susan Mbedi, Oliver P Höner, Camila J Mazzoni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Larissa S ArantesBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research (BeGenDiv), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1374-6701
Jilda A CaccavoLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8172-7855
James K SullivanBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research (BeGenDiv), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1924-3729
Sarah SparmannBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research (BeGenDiv), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9278-4081
Susan MbediBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research (BeGenDiv), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9633-5045
Oliver P HönerLeibniz-Institut für Zoo- und Wildtierforschung (IZW), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0658-3417
Camila J MazzoniBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research (BeGenDiv), Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6758-5427

Funding

European Research Council ERC-2020-ADG 101020503German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 033W034A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic non-invasive sampling (gNIS) is a critical tool for population genetics studies, supporting conservation efforts while imposing minimal impacts on wildlife. However, gNIS often presents variable levels of DNA degradation and non-endogenous contamination, which can incur considerable processing costs. Furthermore, the use of restriction-site-associated DNA sequencing methods (RADseq) for assessing thousands of genetic markers introduces the challenge of obtaining large sets of shared loci with similar coverage across multiple individuals. Here, we present an approach to handling large-scale gNIS-based datasets using data from the spotted hyena population inhabiting the Ngorongoro Crater in Tanzania. We generated 3RADseq data for more than a thousand individuals, mostly from faecal mucus samples collected non-invasively and varying in DNA degradation and contamination level. Using small-scale sequencing, we screened samples for endogenous DNA content, removed highly contaminated samples, confirmed overlap fragment length between libraries, and balanced individual representation in a sequencing pool. We evaluated the impact of (1) DNA degradation and contamination of non-invasive samples, (2) PCR duplicates and (3) different SNP filters on genotype accuracy based on Mendelian error estimated for parent-offspring trio datasets. Our results showed that when balanced for sequencing depth, contaminated samples presented similar genotype error rates to those of non-contaminated samples. We also showed that PCR duplicates and different SNP filters impact genotype accuracy. In summary, we showed the potential of using gNIS for large-scale genetic monitoring based on SNPs and demonstrated how to improve control over library preparation by using a weighted re-pooling strategy that considers the endogenous DNA content.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyGenetics, PopulationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSequence Analysis, DNAAnimalsGene LibraryPolymorphism, Single NucleotideTanzaniafaecal mucusgenetic non‐invasive samplinggenotype error ratespotted hyenastrio analysis

Identifiers

PMID37646753
PMCPMC12142721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.