Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646672›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2024

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma involving osseous sites: utility of response assessment by PET/CT and good longterm outcomes.

Paola Ghione, Salma Ahsanuddin, Efrat Luttwak, Sabela Bobillo Varela, Reiko Nakajima, Laure Michaud, Kanika Gupta, Anastasia Navitski, David Straus, M Lia Palomba and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Paola GhioneLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine. ghionep@mskcc.org.
Salma AhsanuddinLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Efrat LuttwakLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Sabela Bobillo VarelaLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Reiko NakajimaLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Laure MichaudLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Kanika GuptaLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Anastasia NavitskiLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
David StrausLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
M Lia PalombaLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Alison MoskowitzLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Ariela NoyLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Paul HamlinLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Matthew MatasarLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Anita KumarLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Lorenzo FalchiLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Joachim YahalomLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Steven HorwitzLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Andrew ZelenetzLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Anas YounesLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Gilles SallesLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Weill Cornell College of Medicine.
Heiko SchöderWeill Cornell College of Medicine, New York, NY; Radiation Therapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.
Erel JoffeLymphoma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Sackler School of Medicine, Aviv University. erelj@tlvmc.gov.il.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osseous involvement by diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL-bone) is a heterogeneous disease. There is limited data regarding response assessment by positron emission tomography with fluorodeoxyglucose, which may demonstrate residual avidity despite a complete response. We analyzed clinical data of patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and identified all cases with DLBCL-bone. End of treatment scans were reviewed by two independent experts classifying osseous lesions into Deauville (DV) ≤3; DV ≥4, or reactive uptake in the bone marrow (M), site of fracture (F) or surgery (S). We compared outcomes of DLBCL-bone to other extranodal sites (EN) matched on International Prognotic Index features and regimen. Of 1,860 patients with DLBCL (bone 16%; EN 45%; nodal 39%), 41% had localized disease and 59% advanced. Only 9% (n=27) of patients with initial bone involvement had residual fluorodeoxyglucose avidity at the osseous site. In half of these cases, the uptake was attributed to F/S/M, and of the remaining 13, only two were truly refractory (both with persistent disease at other sites). Overall survival and progression-free survival (PFS) were found to be similar for early- stage nodal DLBCL and DLBCL-bone, but inferior in EN-DLBCL. Advanced-stage disease involving the bone had a similar 5-year PFS to nodal disease and EN-DLBCL. After matching for International Prognotic Index and treatment regiments, PFS between bone and other EN sites was similar. Osseous involvement in DLBCL does not portend a worse prognosis. End of treatment DV ≥4 can be expected in 5-10% of cases, but in the absence of other signs of refractory disease, may be followed expectantly.

Indexed as

Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffusePositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyFluorodeoxyglucose F18HumansPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRetrospective StudiesFluorodeoxyglucose F18

Identifiers

PMID37646672
PMCPMC10772505
OpenAlexW4386272237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.