Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646660›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2024

Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study.

Luděk Pour, Monika Szarejko, Jelena Bila, Fredrik H Schjesvold, Ivan Spicka, Vladimir Maisnar, Artur Jurczyszyn, Zhanet Grudeva-Popova, Roman Hájek, Ganna Usenko and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04649060 (A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase 3 Study of Melflufen in Combination With Daratumumab Compared With Daratumumab in Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04649060 phase3terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase 3 Study of Melflufen in Combination With Daratumumab Compared With Daratumumab in Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma

TypeinterventionalSponsorOncopeptides ABRan2020 to 2022Enrolled54ConditionsRelapsed Multiple Myeloma, Relapsed-Refractory Multiple MyelomaArmsMelflufen, Dexamethasone, Daratumumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Monoclonal Antibodies in Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Luděk PourDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno, Babak Myeloma Group, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic. pour.ludek@fnbrno.cz.
Monika SzarejkoUniversity Clinical Centre, Department of Hematology and Transplantology, Gdansk.
Jelena BilaClinic of Hematology, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade.
Fredrik H SchjesvoldOslo Myeloma Center, Department of Hematology, Oslo University Hospital and KG Jebsen Center for B Cell Malignancies, University of Oslo, Oslo.
Ivan Spicka1<sup>st</sup> Department of Medicine - Department of Hematology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
Vladimir Maisnar4<sup>th</sup> Department of Medicine - Hematology, Charles University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic.
Artur JurczyszynPlasma Cell Dyscrasias Center, Department of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Faculty of Medicine, Krakow.
Zhanet Grudeva-PopovaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Medical Faculty, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdic, Bulgaria.
Roman HájekDepartment of Hematooncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
Ganna UsenkoCity Clinical Hospital No. 4 of Dnipro City Council, Dnipro, Ukraine.
Marcus ThuressonOncopeptides AB, Stockholm.
Stefan NorinOncopeptides AB, Stockholm.
Sara JareforsOncopeptides AB, Stockholm.
Nicolaas A BakkerOncopeptides AB, Stockholm.
Paul G RichardsonDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
Maria-Victoria MateosHospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca/IBSAL/CIC, Salamanca.
Oncopeptides (Sweden) · SECharles University · CZDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USGeneral University Hospital in Prague · CZInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESMedical University Plovdiv · BGPlasma (Macedonia) · MKUniversity Clinical Centre · PLUniversity Hospital Brno · CZUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Oslo · NOUniversity of Ostrava · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMelphalanMultiple MyelomaNeoplasms, Plasma CellNeutropeniaPhenylalanineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneHumansProteasome InhibitorsTransplantation, AutologousUnited StatesAntibodies, MonoclonaldaratumumabDexamethasonemelflufenMelphalanPhenylalanineProteasome Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID37646660
PMCPMC10905085
OpenAlexW4386272333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.