Trial reportHaematologica2024
Efficacy and safety of melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: results from the randomized, open-label, phase III LIGHTHOUSE study.
Trial report in Haematologica, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04649060 (A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase 3 Study of Melflufen in Combination With Daratumumab Compared With Daratumumab in Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase 3 Study of Melflufen in Combination With Daratumumab Compared With Daratumumab in Patients With Relapsed or Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Decoding immunotherapy resistance in multiple myeloma: genetic insights and approaches to counter resistance.Science China. Life sciences · 2026Review
- Melflufen in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Limitations, Biological Rationale, and Future Perspectives.Cancers · 2026Review
- Optimizing the use of melflufen (melphalan flufenamide) in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations for clinical practice.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
- Exceptional long-term responses from OCEAN and HORIZON trials: melflufen-dexamethasone as an expansion of treatment options for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the era of new immunotherapies?Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Outcomes of Melflufen Treatment in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies in Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Daratumumab Versus Control Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study of Survival Outcomes Among Multiple Myeloma Patients : Survival Outcomes of Multiple Myeloma Treatment with Daratumumab.Galen medical journal · 2025Review
- Targeted Delivery Strategies for Multiple Myeloma and Their Adverse Drug Reactions.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Progress on angiogenic and antiangiogenic agents in the tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), a first-in-class alkylating peptide-drug conjugate, plus dexamethasone was approved in Europe for use in patients with triple-class refractory relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) with ≥3 prior lines of therapy and without prior autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or with a time to progression >36 months after prior ASCT. The randomized LIGHTHOUSE study (NCT04649060) assessed melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone (melflufen group) versus daratumumab in patients with RRMM with disease refractory to an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor or who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy including an immunomodulatory agent and a proteasome inhibitor. A partial clinical hold issued by the US Food and Drug Administration for all melflufen studies led to financial constraints and premature study closure on February 23rd 2022 (data cut-off date). In total, 54 of 240 planned patients were randomized (melflufen group, N=27; daratumumab group, N=27). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached in the melflufen group versus 4.9 months in the daratumumab group (Hazard Ratio: 0.18 [95% Confidence Interval, 0.05-0.65]; P=0.0032) at a median follow-up time of 7.1 and 6.6 months, respectively. Overall response rate (ORR) was 59% in the melflufen group versus 30% in the daratumumab group (P=0.0300). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events in the melflufen group versus daratumumab group were neutropenia (50% vs. 12%), thrombocytopenia (50% vs. 8%), and anemia (32% vs. 19%). Melflufen plus daratumumab and dexamethasone demonstrated superior PFS and ORR versus daratumumab in RRMM and a safety profile comparable to previously published melflufen studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.