Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37646138›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2023

Effects of an Acute High Intensity Exercise Bout on Retention of Explicit, Strategic Locomotor Learning in Individuals With Chronic Stroke.

Elizabeth D Thompson, Soumya Bhat, Margaret A French, Susanne Morton, Ryan T Pohlig, Darcy S Reisman

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03726047 (Feedback and Cognition During Locomotor Learning Post Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03726047 narecruitingnot on this map

Feedback and Cognition During Locomotor Learning Post Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of DelawareRan2019 to 2027Enrolled80ConditionsStrokeArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Elizabeth D ThompsonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9808-4991
Soumya BhatDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Margaret A FrenchDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3581-7374
Susanne MortonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Ryan T PohligBiostatistics Core, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Darcy S ReismanDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6546-0863

Funding

Behavioral and Neurophysiologic Process of Locomotor Learning After StrokeR01HD078330 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI REISMAN, DARCY S. · 2014 to 2025
$3.2M
Factors impacting locomotor learning following strokeF31NS111806 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI FRENCH, MARGARET · 2019 to 2021
$43k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078330NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS111806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExercise priming, pairing high intensity exercise with a motor learning task, improves retention of upper extremity tasks in individuals after stroke, but has shown no benefit to locomotor learning. This difference may relate to the type of learning studied. Upper extremity studies used explicit, strategic tasks; locomotor studies used implicit sensorimotor adaptation (split-belt treadmill). Since walking is an important rehabilitation goal, it is crucial to understand under which circumstances exercise priming may improve retention of a newly learned walking pattern.

objectiveDetermine the impact of exercise priming on explicit, strategic locomotor learning task retention in chronic stroke survivors.

methodsChronic stroke survivors (>6 months) performed 2 treadmill walking sessions. Visual feedback was used to train increased step length. Participants were assigned to control group (no exercise), continuous exercise (5 minutes high intensity), or long-interval exercise (15 minutes high/moderate intervals). After day 1 learning, participants either rested or performed exercise. On day 2, retention of the learned walking pattern was tested.

resultsAll groups learned on day 1 (

conclusionsExercise priming did not affect retention of an explicit locomotor task in chronic stroke survivors. Further work should explore subgroups of individuals for whom priming may have selective clinical benefit to locomotor learning.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03726047.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationAdaptation, PhysiologicalExerciseHumansLearningWalkingexercise priminggaitlocomotor learningstroke

Identifiers

PMID37646138
PMCPMC10529423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.