ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2023
Identifying spinal tracts transmitting distant effects of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Estimating the state of tract-specific inputs to spinal motoneurons is critical to understanding movement deficits induced by neurological injury and potential pathways to recovery but remains challenging in humans. In this study, we explored the capability of trans-spinal magnetic stimulation (TSMS) to modulate distal reflex circuits in young adults. TSMS was applied over the thoracic spine to condition soleus H-reflexes involving sacral-level motoneurons. Three TSMS intensities below the motor threshold were applied at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) between 2 and 20 ms relative to peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS). Although low-intensity TSMS yielded no changes in H-reflexes across ISIs, the two higher stimulus intensities yielded two phases of H-reflex inhibition: a relatively long-lasting period at 2- to 9-ms ISIs, and a short phase at 11- to 12-ms ISIs. H-reflex inhibition at 2-ms ISI was uniquely dependent on TSMS intensity. To identify the candidate neural pathways contributing to H-reflex suppression, we constructed a tract-specific conduction time estimation model. Based upon our model, H-reflex inhibition at 11- to 12-ms ISIs is likely a manifestation of orthodromic transmission along the lateral reticulospinal tract. In contrast, the inhibition at 2-ms ISI likely reflects orthodromic transmission along sensory fibers with activation reaching the brain, before descending along motor tracts. Multiple pathways may contribute to H-reflex modulation between 4- and 9-ms ISIs, orthodromic transmission along sensorimotor tracts, and antidromic transmission of multiple motor tracts. Our findings suggest that noninvasive TSMS can influence motoneuron excitability at distal segments and that the contribution of specific tracts to motoneuron excitability may be distinguishable based on conduction velocities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.