Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645970›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Assessing the integrity of auditory sensory memory processing in CLN

Tufikameni Brima, Edward G Freedman, Kevin D Prinsloo, Erika F Augustine, Heather R Adams, Kuan Hong Wang, Jonathan W Mink, Luke H Shaw, Emma P Mantel, John J Foxe

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tufikameni BrimaThe Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Edward G FreedmanThe Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Kevin D PrinslooThe Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Erika F AugustineUniversity of Rochester Batten Center (URBC), Department of Neurology and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Heather R AdamsUniversity of Rochester Batten Center (URBC), Department of Neurology and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Kuan Hong WangThe Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Jonathan W MinkUniversity of Rochester Batten Center (URBC), Department of Neurology and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Luke H ShawThe Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
Emma P MantelThe Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.
John J FoxeThe Frederick J. and Marion A. Schindler Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Department of Neuroscience and The Ernest J. Del Monte Institute for Neuroscience, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4300-3098
University of Rochester · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Training & EducationU54NS065768 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WHITLEY, CHESTER B. · 2009 to 2024
$17.7M
University of Rochester Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research CenterP50HD103536 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Leona Ashley Oakes · 2020 to 2026
$9.8M
Meaningful Outcomes and Multi-Site Readiness for Clinical Trials in Juvenile Neuronal Ceroid LipofuscinosisU01NS101946 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI AUGUSTINE, ERIKA · 2019 to 2024
$3.7M
Clinical and Neuropsychological Investigations in Batten DiseaseR01NS060022 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI MINK, JONATHAN W. · 2007 to 2010
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103536NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS060022NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS101946NINDS NIH HHS U54 NS065768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We interrogated auditory sensory memory capabilities in individuals with CLN3 disease (juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis), specifically for the feature of "duration" processing, a critical cue in speech perception. Given decrements in speech and language skills associated with later-stage CLN3 disease, we hypothesized that the duration-evoked mismatch negativity (MMN) of the event related potential (ERP) would be a marker of progressively atypical cortical processing in this population, with potential applicability as a brain-based biomarker in clinical trials. Methods: We employed three stimulation rates (fast: 450 ms, medium: 900 ms, slow: 1800 ms), allowing for assessment of the sustainability of the auditory sensory memory trace. The robustness of MMN directly relates to the rate at which the regularly occurring stimulus stream is presented. As presentation rate slows, robustness of the sensory memory trace diminishes. By manipulating presentation rate, the strength of the sensory memory trace is parametrically varied, providing greater sensitivity to detect auditory cortical dysfunction. A secondary hypothesis was that duration-evoked MMN abnormalities in CLN3 disease would be more severe at slower presentation rates, resulting from greater demand on the sensory memory system. Results: Data from individuals with CLN3 disease (N=21; range 6-28 years of age) showed robust MMN responses (i.e., intact auditory sensory memory processes) at the medium stimulation rate. However, at the fastest rate, MMN was significantly reduced, and at the slowest rate, MMN was not detectable in CLN3 disease relative to neurotypical controls (N=41; ages 6-26 years). Conclusions: Results reveal emerging insufficiencies in this critical auditory perceptual system in individuals with

Indexed as

EEGERPEvent Related PotentialJNCLLysosomal Storage DisorderNeurodegenerative diseaseNeurodevelopmental Disorder

Identifiers

PMID37645970
PMCPMC10462191
OpenAlexW4385994588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.