Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645621›Full record

ReviewCommunicative & integrative biology2023

On power and its corrupting effects: the effects of power on human behavior and the limits of accountability systems.

Tobore Onojighofia Tobore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communicative & integrative biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Tobore Onojighofia ToboreIndependent Scholar, Yardley, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7334-2915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Power is an all-pervasive, and fundamental force in human relationships and plays a valuable role in social, political, and economic interactions. Power differences are important in social groups in enhancing group functioning. Most people want to have power and there are many benefits to having power. However, power is a corrupting force and this has been a topic of interest for centuries to scholars from Plato to Lord Acton. Even with increased knowledge of power's corrupting effect and safeguards put in place to counteract such tendencies, power abuse remains rampant in society suggesting that the full extent of this effect is not well understood. In this paper, an effort is made to improve understanding of power's corrupting effects on human behavior through an integrated and comprehensive synthesis of the neurological, sociological, physiological, and psychological literature on power. The structural limits of justice systems' capability to hold powerful people accountable are also discussed.

Indexed as

DominanceDominance Hierarchyhigh power and low statusJustice systemspowerpower addictionPower and Accesspower and aggressive behaviorpower and ambitionpower and bariatric surgerypower and biaspower and cooperationpower and corruptionpower and credibilitypower and dehumanizing behaviorpower and demeaning behaviorpower and disinhibited behaviorpower and entitlementPower and Evolutionpower and gossippower and hypocrisyPower and Mental HealthPower and Nepotismpower and overconfidencepower and physical attractivenessPower and self-interested behaviorpower and self righteousnessPower and Sexpower and sexual harassmentPower and sizePower and Statuspower and unethical behaviorpower and victimhoodPowerlessness and behaviorSocial RankSocial StatusSocioeconomic statusstructural limits of accountability systems

Identifiers

PMID37645621
PMCPMC10461512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.