Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645614›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of clinical and experimental urology2023

Ureteral stenting in the clinic: a safe and cost-effective alternative to the operating room.

Zachary M Connelly, Ann Stolzle, Robert August Vanlangendonck, Wybra Joey Price, Kevin Morgan, Nazih Khater

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of clinical and experimental urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact, top 67% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zachary M ConnellyDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Shreveport, LA, USA.
Ann StolzleDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Shreveport, LA, USA.
Robert August VanlangendonckDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Shreveport, LA, USA.
Wybra Joey PriceDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Shreveport, LA, USA.
Kevin MorganDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Shreveport, LA, USA.
Nazih KhaterDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport Shreveport, LA, USA.
Louisiana State University in Shreveport · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeUreteral stent placement is one of the most common procedures performed by urologists, and is typically done in the operating room. At Ochsner-LSU Health Shreveport, urologists have a unique setting allowing them to place ureteral stents for patients present in the outpatient ambulatory clinic without the need for nitrous oxide. This allows patients to avoid being admitted to the hospital and receiving subsequent general anesthesia in the operating room. Therefore, our novel study evaluates the feasibility, safety, and cost-effectiveness of ureteral stents insertion in the clinic. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study, we analyzed 240 patients with a total of 279 different ureteral stent insertion encounters to evaluate the safety and costs of stenting in the clinic compared to the operating room. Stents were placed in the outpatient clinic for 126 patients, which required either a new ureteral stent insertion or a scheduled stent exchange.

resultsOverall, there was an increased age and length of stent duration among those who were stented in the clinic. We did not observe any increase in narcotics use, pain, adverse injuries, or differences in stent length. The total cost of a stent insertion operating room was $16,349.91 whereas the clinic procedure cost $7,865.69, however: medicare reimbursement remained the same.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate a novel use of stenting in the clinic is feasible as an outpatient alternative. It is a safe alternative to the operating room, and more cost-effective.

Indexed as

costcost analysisStents

Identifiers

PMID37645614
PMCPMC10461035
OpenAlexW4386271276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.