ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2023
Research progress of biomaterials and innovative technologies in urinary tissue engineering.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- MMP-2 Responsive Functional Bladder Acellular Matrix Scaffold Combined With Urine Derived Stem Cells for Bladder Nerve Regeneration.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
- Preclinical development of engineered biomaterial-based artificial bladder demonstrating core functions in a large-animal orthotopic model.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Functional polysaccharide-based bioactive delivery systems for urinary and reproductive system therapeutics.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026Review
- Defining Uroplastics as a Collaborative Discipline at the Interface of Urology and Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- The Future of Bladder Cancer Therapies: Integrating Hydrogel Scaffolds for Epigenetic Regulator Delivery.Cureus · 2025Review
- Description of the Human Penile Urethra Epithelium.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy for Thoracic Surgeons: An Update.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Substantial interests have been attracted to multiple bioactive and biomimetic biomaterials in recent decades because of their ability in presenting a structural and functional reconstruction of urinary tissues. Some innovative technologies have also been surging in urinary tissue engineering and urological regeneration by providing insights into the physiological behavior of the urinary system. As such, the hierarchical structure and tissue function of the bladder, urethra, and ureter can be reproduced similarly to the native urinary tissues. This review aims to summarize recent advances in functional biomaterials and biomimetic technologies toward urological reconstruction. Various nanofirous biomaterials derived from decellularized natural tissues, synthetic biopolymers, and hybrid scaffolds were developed with desired microstructure, surface chemistry, and mechanical properties. Some growth factors, drugs, as well as inorganic nanomaterials were also utilized to enhance the biological activity and functionality of scaffolds. Notably, it is emphasized that advanced approaches, such as 3D (bio) printing and organoids, have also been developed to facilitate structural and functional regeneration of the urological system. So in this review, we discussed the fabrication strategies, physiochemical properties, and biofunctional modification of regenerative biomaterials and their potential clinical application of fast-evolving technologies. In addition, future prospective and commercial products are further proposed and discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.