ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2023
Case report: Unusual cause of refractory hypoxemia after pacemaker lead extraction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A 59-year-old woman with a history of a pacemaker implanted for III-degree atrioventricular block was admitted due to pocket infection. The atrial and ventricular leads were removed via the right femoral vein using a needle's eye snare. Hypoxemia was observed immediately after the removal of the lead. It was refractory to oxygen therapy. The pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) showed 89% in the supine position and 77% in the upright position. However, the CTPA and pulmonary perfusion SPECT/CT imaging did not reveal any signs of pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary function tests and chest CT showed normal results. Transthoracic contrast echocardiography revealed a patent foramen ovale (PFO) and a right-to-left intracardiac shunt, no significant tricuspid regurgitation, without any signs of elevated right heart pressure or pulmonary hypertension. Hypoxemia was considered to be associated with the right-to-left shunt through PFO. The condition was relieved by percutaneous closure of the PFO. Refractory hypoxemia resulting from an intracardiac right-to-left shunt following pacemaker lead extraction is a rare but serious complication. Transthoracic contrast echocardiography helps in diagnosis. If the right-to-left intracardiac shunt through PFO persists irreversibly and the associated hypoxemic symptoms are significant, closure of the PFO is necessary. Transesophageal echocardiography also revealed the presence of a left-to-right shunt through PFO during cardiac systole. The closure of the PFO is also necessary to avoid long-term complications, such as chronic pulmonary hypertension and right heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.