Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645514›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology and behavioral medicine2023

Executive functioning as a moderator of flossing behaviour among young adults: a temporal self-regulation theory perspective.

Adam A Rogers, Anne E M Halvari, Jan-Are K Johnsen, Anne-Kristin Solbakk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology and behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adam A RogersInstitute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9523-2688
Anne E M HalvariInstitute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5506-4704
Jan-Are K JohnsenInstitute of Clinical Dentistry, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6976-6192
Anne-Kristin SolbakkRITMO Centre for Interdisciplinary Studies in Rhythm, Time, and Motion, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9486-5440
University of Oslo · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Flossing among young adults is often infrequent and barriers not completely understood. One explanation concerns the capacity for executive functioning (EF) during the self-regulation of behaviour. Methods: Using Temporal Self-Regulation Theory (TST) as a framework to explore EF, young adults from Norwegian universities completed a survey that measured monthly flossing frequency, flossing-related intentions and behavioural prepotency (BP), and EF using the Behaviour Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Adult Version (BRIEF-A). Results: Data from 362 participants were analysed. The TST-model explained a substantial proportion of variance in monthly flossing ( Conclusion: EF plays a role in moderating the translation of intentions into flossing behaviour. Specifically, emotional control and task-shifting appear to be influential, and this influence increases when habitual and environmental support (i.e. BP) is reduced. Overcoming EF-barriers may represent a key step in establishing flossing behaviours.

Indexed as

BRIEF-Aexecutive functioningOral hygiene behaviourself-regulationtemporal self-regulation theory

Identifiers

PMID37645514
PMCPMC10461502
OpenAlexW4386221737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.