Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645266›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22023

Identification of supraventricular tachycardia mechanisms with surface electrocardiograms using a convolutional neural network.

Satoshi Higuchi, Roland Li, Edward P Gerstenfeld, L Bing Liem, Sung Il Im, Shadi Kalantarian, Minhaj Ansari, Sean Abreau, Joshua Barrios, Melvin M Scheinman and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi HiguchiSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Roland LiDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Edward P GerstenfeldSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
L Bing LiemSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sung Il ImSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Shadi KalantarianSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Minhaj AnsariDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Sean AbreauDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Joshua BarriosDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Melvin M ScheinmanSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Geoffrey H TisonDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
University of California, San Francisco · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: It remains difficult to definitively distinguish supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) mechanisms using a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) alone. Machine learning may identify visually imperceptible changes on 12-lead ECGs and may improve ability to determine SVT mechanisms. Objective: We sought to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) that identifies the SVT mechanism according to the gold standard of SVT ablation and to compare CNN performance against experienced electrophysiologists among patients with atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrioventricular reciprocating tachycardia (AVRT), and atrial tachycardia (AT). Methods: All patients with 12-lead surface ECG during sinus rhythm and SVT and had successful SVT ablation from 2013 to 2020 were included. A CNN was trained using data from 1505 surface ECGs that were split into 1287 training and 218 test ECG datasets. We compared the CNN performance against independent adjudication by 2 experienced cardiac electrophysiologists on the test dataset. Results: Our dataset comprised 1505 ECGs (368 AVNRT, 304 AVRT, 95 AT, and 738 sinus rhythm) from 725 patients. The CNN areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve for AVNRT, AVRT, and AT were 0.909, 0.867, and 0.817, respectively. When fixing the specificity of the CNN to the electrophysiologist adjudicators' specificity, the CNN identified all SVT classes with higher sensitivity: (1) AVNRT (91.7% vs 65.9%), (2) AVRT (78.4% vs 63.6%), and (3) AT (61.5% vs 50.0%). Conclusion: A CNN can be trained to differentiate SVT mechanisms from surface 12-lead ECGs with high overall performance, achieving similar performance to experienced electrophysiologists at fixed specificities.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceConvolutional neural networkElectrocardiogramLong RP tachycardiaMachine learningSupraventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID37645266
PMCPMC10461210
OpenAlexW4384156517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.