ArticleArXiv2023
2D antiscatter grid and scatter sampling based CBCT pipeline for image guided radiation therapy.
Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poor tissue visualization and quantitative accuracy in CBCT is a major barrier in expanding the role of CBCT imaging from target localization to quantitative treatment monitoring and plan adaptations in radiation therapy sessions. To further improve image quality in CBCT, 2D antiscatter grid based scatter rejection was combined with a raw data processing pipeline and iterative image reconstruction. The culmination of these steps was referred as quantitative CBCT, qCBCT. qCBCT data processing steps include 2D antiscatter grid implementation, measurement based residual scatter, image lag, and beam hardening correction for offset detector geometry CBCT with a bow tie filter. Images were reconstructed with iterative image reconstruction to reduce image noise. To evaluate image quality, qCBCT acquisitions were performed using a variety of phantoms to investigate the effect of object size and its composition on image quality. qCBCT image quality was benchmarked against clinical CBCT and MDCT images. Addition of image lag and beam hardening correction to scatter suppression reduced HU degradation in qCBCT by 10 HU and 40 HU, respectively. When compared to gold standard MDCT, mean HU errors in qCBCT and clinical CBCT were 10 HU and 27 HU, respectively. HU inaccuracy due to change in phantom size was 22 HU and 85 HU in qCBCT and clinical CBCT images, respectively. With iterative reconstruction, contrast to noise ratio improved by a factor of 1.25 when compared to clinical CBCT protocols. Robust artifact and noise suppression in qCBCT images can reduce the image quality gap between CBCT and MDCT, improving the promise of qCBCT in fulfilling the tasks that demand high quantitative accuracy, such as CBCT based dose calculations and treatment response assessment in image guided radiation therapy.
Identifiers
37645051PMC10462180W4386272643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.