ArticleArXiv2023
Modeling and interpretation of single-cell proteogenomic data.
Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological functions stem from coordinated interactions among proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules. Mass spectrometry technologies for reliable, high throughput single-cell proteomics will add a new modality to genomics and enable data-driven modeling of the molecular mechanisms coordinating proteins and nucleic acids at single-cell resolution. This promising potential requires estimating the reliability of measurements and computational analysis so that models can distinguish biological regulation from technical artifacts. We highlight different measurement modes that can support single-cell proteogenomic analysis and how to estimate their reliability. We then discuss approaches for developing both abstract and mechanistic models that aim to biologically interpret the measured differences across modalities, including specific applications to directed stem cell differentiation and to inferring protein interactions in cancer cells from the buffing of DNA copy-number variations. Single-cell proteogenomic data will support mechanistic models of direct molecular interactions that will provide generalizable and predictive representations of biological systems.
Identifiers
37645043PMC10462161What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.