Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645043›Full record

ArticleArXiv2023

Modeling and interpretation of single-cell proteogenomic data.

Andrew Leduc, Hannah Harens, Nikolai Slavov

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew LeducDepartments of Bioengineering, Biology, Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Single Cell Proteomics Center, and Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Hannah HarensDepartments of Bioengineering, Biology, Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Single Cell Proteomics Center, and Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Nikolai SlavovDepartments of Bioengineering, Biology, Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Single Cell Proteomics Center, and Barnett Institute, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Collaborative Research: DMS/NIGMS 2: Methods for Systematic Analysis of Post-transcriptional Regulation in Single CellsR01GM144967 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI FRANKS, ALEXANDER, SLAVOV, NIKOLAI · 2021 to 2024
$779k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM144967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biological functions stem from coordinated interactions among proteins, nucleic acids and small molecules. Mass spectrometry technologies for reliable, high throughput single-cell proteomics will add a new modality to genomics and enable data-driven modeling of the molecular mechanisms coordinating proteins and nucleic acids at single-cell resolution. This promising potential requires estimating the reliability of measurements and computational analysis so that models can distinguish biological regulation from technical artifacts. We highlight different measurement modes that can support single-cell proteogenomic analysis and how to estimate their reliability. We then discuss approaches for developing both abstract and mechanistic models that aim to biologically interpret the measured differences across modalities, including specific applications to directed stem cell differentiation and to inferring protein interactions in cancer cells from the buffing of DNA copy-number variations. Single-cell proteogenomic data will support mechanistic models of direct molecular interactions that will provide generalizable and predictive representations of biological systems.

Identifiers

PMID37645043
PMCPMC10462161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.