ArticleArXiv2023
3D cine-magnetic resonance imaging using spatial and temporal implicit neural representation learning (STINR-MR).
Article in ArXiv, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: 3D cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) can capture images of the human body volume with high spatial and temporal resolutions to study the anatomical dynamics. However, the reconstruction of 3D cine-MRI is challenged by highly undersampled k-space data in each dynamic (cine) frame, due to the slow speed of MR signal acquisition. We proposed a machine learning-based framework, spatial and temporal implicit neural representation learning (STINR-MR), for accurate 3D cine-MRI reconstruction from highly undersampled data. Approach: STINR-MR used a joint reconstruction and deformable registration approach to achieve a high acceleration factor for cine volumetric imaging. It addressed the ill-posed spatiotemporal reconstruction problem by solving a reference-frame 3D MR image and a corresponding motion model which deforms the reference frame to each cine frame. The reference-frame 3D MR image was reconstructed as a spatial implicit neural representation (INR) network, which learns the mapping from input 3D spatial coordinates to corresponding MR values. The dynamic motion model was constructed via a temporal INR, as well as basis deformation vector fields (DVFs) extracted from prior/onboard 4D-MRIs using principal component analysis (PCA). The learned temporal INR encodes input time points and outputs corresponding weighting factors to combine the basis DVFs into time-resolved motion fields that represent cine-frame-specific dynamics. STINR-MR was evaluated using MR data simulated from the 4D extended cardiac-torso (XCAT) digital phantom, as well as MR data acquired clinically from a healthy human subject. Its reconstruction accuracy was also compared with that of the model-based non-rigid motion estimation method (MR-MOTUS). Main results: STINR-MR can reconstruct 3D cine-MR images with high temporal (<100 ms) and spatial (3 mm) resolutions. Compared with MR-MOTUS, STINR-MR consistently reconstructed images with better image quality and fewer artifacts and achieved superior tumor localization accuracy via the solved dynamic DVFs. For the XCAT study, STINR reconstructed the tumors to a mean±S.D. center-of-mass error of 1.0±0.4 mm, compared to 3.4±1.0 mm of the MR-MOTUS method. The high-frame-rate reconstruction capability of STINR-MR allows different irregular motion patterns to be accurately captured. Significance: STINR-MR provides a lightweight and efficient framework for accurate 3D cine-MRI reconstruction. It is a 'one-shot' method that does not require external data for pre-training, allowing it to avoid generalizability issues typically encountered in deep learning-based methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37645038PMC10462175What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.