ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2023
Routine FEV
Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discordance Between Clinical Suspicion and Spirometry-Defined Reversible Airflow Obstruction in Children with Sickle Cell Disease in French Guiana.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Long-term Outcomes of Children Undergoing Thoracotomy Lung Resection for Congenital Lung Malformations.Surgery today · 2026Article
- Real-life application of respiratory oscillometry in pediatric asthma outpatient care: Feasibility and methodological aspects.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Developmentally Regulated CYP2E1 Expression Is Associated with a Fetal Pulmonary Transcriptional Response to Maternal Acetaminophen Exposure.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Digitally mapping the asthma journey-from diagnosis to remission.EClinicalMedicine · 2025Review
- Use of exhaled nitric oxide in the diagnosis and monitoring of childhood asthma: myth or maxim?Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Childhood asthma is a common condition in children. This review describes the evidence from seven asthma guidelines for using spirometry in the diagnosis and monitoring of childhood asthma. All guidelines recommend spirometry as the primary test to be performed for diagnosing asthma in children aged >5 years. Spirometry is often normal in children with asthma. Guidelines are not consistent with respect to whether forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV Educational aims: To provide knowledge of the commonly used guidelines for asthma diagnosis and management.To give insight into the opportunities and challenges in using spirometry to diagnose and monitor asthma in children.To provide an understanding of the precision of spirometry for diagnosing asthma.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.