Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645007›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2023

Comparing Effects of Rhythmic Breathing and Lidocaine Spray on Pain Intensity During Needle Insertion Into Arteriovenous Fistula in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Houman Sadeghpour Marvi, Tahereh Baloochi Beydokhti, Moosa Sajjadi, Behruz Khaleghimanesh

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06418009 (Determination of the Effect of Cold Needle Application on Invasive Pain Associated With Fistula Cannulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06418009 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Determination of the Effect of Cold Needle Application on Invasive Pain Associated With Fistula Cannulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Demiroglu Bilim UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled35ConditionsHemodialysis Complication, PainArmsCold needle application
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Houman Sadeghpour MarviSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5029-8322
Tahereh Baloochi BeydokhtiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2313-7814
Moosa SajjadiSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Gonabad University of Medical Sciences, Gonabad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5449-9113
Behruz KhaleghimaneshImam Reza Hospital, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3639-0728
Gonabad University of Medical Sciences · IRMashhad University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hemodialysis patients suffer from pain caused by needle insertion into the fistula site. Non-pharmacological methods may be associated with acceptable effects. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare the effects of two interventions on pain intensity during needle insertion into the arteriovenous fistula in hemodialysis patients. Methods: This self-controlled, single-blind clinical trial was conducted on 54 hemodialysis subjects with arteriovenous fistula in Mashhad in 2021. In this regard, the patients were selected according to the inclusion criteria and randomly assigned to two groups (lidocaine spray and rhythmic breathing). In each group, pain intensity was assessed based on the visual analogue scale (VAS) before the intervention, followed by measuring the post-intervention pain intensity during three consecutive hemodialysis sessions every other day. Regarding the lidocaine spray group, two puffs of 10% lidocaine spray (20 mg) were sprayed on the needle insertion site five minutes before cannulation. However, the patients in another group took a long deep breath through the nose with three numbers, held their breath in the lungs for three numbers, and slowly exhaled through the mouth with three numbers two minutes before cannulation. The data were analyzed using SPSS software version 20, and Mann-Whitney U, Wilcoxon, chi-squared, and paired Results: The results represented a significant decrease in the pain severity scores of both rhythmic breathing (P = 0.023) and lidocaine spray (P < 0.001) groups after the intervention. Moreover, a more significant difference was observed between pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores in the group treated with lidocaine spray (1.16 ± 1.56) compared to the other group (0.508 ± 1.25). Conclusions: The lidocaine spray group had a larger difference in the pre-and post-intervention pain intensity scores than the rhythmic group; however, the difference was not significant. The rhythmic breathing can be used by nurses as a non-pharmacological method with low complications in hemodialysis departments because of declining pain.

Indexed as

Arteriovenous FistulaHemodialysisLidocainePainRhythmic Breathing

Identifiers

PMID37645007
PMCPMC10461387
OpenAlexW4366086548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.