Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37645005›Full record

ArticleAnesthesiology and pain medicine2023

Effects of Immersive Virtual Reality on Patient Anxiety During Surgery Under Regional Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Johan Arifin, Mochamat Mochamat, Taufan Pramadika, Dina Paramita, Widya Istanto Nurcahyo

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesiology and pain medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Extended reality in anesthesia: a narrative review.Korean journal of anesthesiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Johan ArifinDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Mochamat MochamatDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Taufan PramadikaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Dina ParamitaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Widya Istanto NurcahyoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine, Diponegoro University, Semarang, Indonesia.
Dr. Kariadi Hospital · IDDiponegoro University · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Surgery and anesthesia are associated with increased patient anxiety. Perioperative anxiety is a common problem in regional anesthesia procedures and has an extensive impact. Immersive virtual reality (IVR) is a potential non-pharmacological distraction method to reduce anxiety. Immersive virtual reality creates a virtual environment that allows patients to interact and immerse in the virtual world, reducing patient anxiety. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the effect of IVR on the anxiety of patients undergoing regional anesthetic surgery. Methods: A total of 30 participants referred to Dr. Kariadi General Hospital (Indonesia) from October 2021 to December 2021 were enrolled in this randomized, single-blind clinical trial. The patients were divided into virtual reality (VR) and control groups (n = 15 in each group). The control group received midazolam (0.02 mg/kg) as premedication. The VR group received an IVR intervention without premedication. The data of anxiety scores were assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 6 (STAI-6). This study also collected vital signs, side effects, and patient and surgeon satisfaction level data. Results: The average anxiety level during surgery in the operating room decreased in both groups (P < 0.05); the VR group had a lower score (P = 0.04). A significant reduction in perioperative anxiety levels was observed in the VR group compared to the control group. The patient satisfaction level was also significantly higher in the VR group than in the control group (P = 0.024). Both groups had no significant difference in monitored vital signs, side effects, and surgeon satisfaction. Conclusions: The IVR intervention could reduce anxiety in patients undergoing surgery under regional anesthesia and improve patient satisfaction.

Indexed as

AnxietyImmersive Virtual RealityRegional AnesthesiaSurgery

Identifiers

PMID37645005
PMCPMC10461385
OpenAlexW4323075929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.