Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644987›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2023

Privacy-preserving continual learning methods for medical image classification: a comparative analysis.

Tanvi Verma, Liyuan Jin, Jun Zhou, Jia Huang, Mingrui Tan, Benjamin Chen Ming Choong, Ting Fang Tan, Fei Gao, Xinxing Xu, Daniel S Ting and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. CRoP: Context-wise Robust Static Human-Sensing Personalization.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tanvi Verma *Institute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Liyuan Jin *Artificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Jun ZhouInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Jia HuangInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Mingrui TanInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Benjamin Chen Ming ChoongInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Ting Fang TanArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Fei GaoInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Xinxing XuInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Daniel S TingArtificial Intelligence and Digital Innovation Research Group, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.
Yong LiuInstitute of High Performance Computing, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Agency for Science, Technology and Research · SGInstitute of High Performance Computing · SGSingapore Eye Research Institute · SGSingapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The implementation of deep learning models for medical image classification poses significant challenges, including gradual performance degradation and limited adaptability to new diseases. However, frequent retraining of models is unfeasible and raises concerns about healthcare privacy due to the retention of prior patient data. To address these issues, this study investigated privacy-preserving continual learning methods as an alternative solution. Methods: We evaluated twelve privacy-preserving non-storage continual learning algorithms based deep learning models for classifying retinal diseases from public optical coherence tomography (OCT) images, in a class-incremental learning scenario. The OCT dataset comprises 108,309 OCT images. Its classes include normal (47.21%), drusen (7.96%), choroidal neovascularization (CNV) (34.35%), and diabetic macular edema (DME) (10.48%). Each class consisted of 250 testing images. For continuous training, the first task involved CNV and normal classes, the second task focused on DME class, and the third task included drusen class. All selected algorithms were further experimented with different training sequence combinations. The final model's average class accuracy was measured. The performance of the joint model obtained through retraining and the original finetune model without continual learning algorithms were compared. Additionally, a publicly available medical dataset for colon cancer detection based on histology slides was selected as a proof of concept, while the CIFAR10 dataset was included as the continual learning benchmark. Results: Among the continual learning algorithms, Brain-inspired-replay (BIR) outperformed the others in the continual learning-based classification of retinal diseases from OCT images, achieving an accuracy of 62.00% (95% confidence interval: 59.36-64.64%), with consistent top performance observed in different training sequences. For colon cancer histology classification, Efficient Feature Transformations (EFT) attained the highest accuracy of 66.82% (95% confidence interval: 64.23-69.42%). In comparison, the joint model achieved accuracies of 90.76% and 89.28%, respectively. The finetune model demonstrated catastrophic forgetting in both datasets. Conclusion: Although the joint retraining model exhibited superior performance, continual learning holds promise in mitigating catastrophic forgetting and facilitating continual model updates while preserving privacy in healthcare deep learning models. Thus, it presents a highly promising solution for the long-term clinical deployment of such models.

Indexed as

comparative analysiscontinual learningmedical image classificationmodel deploymentoptical coherence tomography

Identifiers

PMID37644987
PMCPMC10461441
OpenAlexW4385837543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.