Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644979›Full record

ArticleIntegrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)2023

GoodFibes: An R Package for The Detection of Muscle Fibers from diceCT Scans.

J H Arbour

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. GoodFibes: An R Package for The Detection of Muscle Fibers from diceCT Scans.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

J H ArbourDepartment of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, 37132, TN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4506-158X
Middle Tennessee State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast enhanced computed-tomography imaging like diffusible iodine-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) can provide detailed information on muscle architecture important to comparative analyses of functional morphology, using non-destructive approaches. However, manual segmentation of muscle fascicles/fibers is time-consuming, and automated approaches are at times inaccessible and unaffordable. Here, we introduce GoodFibes, an R package for reconstructing muscle architecture in 3D from diceCT image stacks. GoodFibes uses textural analysis of image grayscale values to track straight or curved fiber paths through a muscle image stack. Accessory functions provide quality checking, fiber merging, and 3D visualization and export capabilities. We demonstrate the utility and effectiveness of GoodFibes using two datasets, from an ant and bat diceCT scans. In both cases, GoodFibes provides reliable measurements of mean fiber length compared to traditional approaches, and is as effective as currently available software packages. This open-source, free to use software package will help to improve access to tools in the analysis of muscle fiber anatomy using diceCT scans. The flexible and transparent R-language environment allows other users to build on the functions described here and permits direct statistical analysis of the resulting fiber metrics. We hope that this will increase the number of comparative and evolutionary studies incorporating these rich and functionally important datasets.

Identifiers

PMID37644979
PMCPMC10461528
OpenAlexW4385902464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.