Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37644961›Full record

ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023

Guidance document on the impact of water treatment processes on residues of active substances or their metabolites in water abstracted for the production of drinking water.

European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Roberta Hofman-Caris, Milou Dingemans, Astrid Reus, Sanah Majid Shaikh, Julian Muñoz Sierra, Ursula Karges, Tim Aus der Beek, Eugénia Nogueiro, Christopher Lythgo and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Removal of pharmaceutical pollutants by adsorption onto novel metal-organic frameworks.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Pesticide transformation products: a potential new source of interest for drinking water.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) and European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)
Roberta Hofman-Caris
Milou Dingemans
Astrid Reus
Sanah Majid Shaikh
Julian Muñoz Sierra
Ursula Karges
Tim Aus der Beek
Eugénia Nogueiro
Christopher Lythgo
Juan Manuel Parra Morte
Maria Bastaki
Rositsa Serafimova
Anja Friel
Daniele Court Marques
Andreas Uphoff
Lucie Bielska
Claudio Putzu
Laura Ruggeri
Paschalina Papadaki

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This guidance document provides a tiered framework for risk assessors and facilitates risk managers in making decisions concerning the approval of active substances (AS) that are chemicals in plant protection products (PPPs) and biocidal products, and authorisation of the products. Based on the approaches presented in this document, a conclusion can be drawn on the impact of water treatment processes on residues of the AS or its metabolites in surface water and/or groundwater abstracted for the production of drinking water, i.e. the formation of transformation products (TPs). This guidance enables the identification of actual public health concerns from exposure to harmful compounds generated during the processing of water for the production of drinking water, and it focuses on water treatment methods commonly used in the European Union (EU). The tiered framework determines whether residues from PPP use or residues from biocidal product use can be present in water at water abstraction locations. Approaches, including experimental methods, are described that can be used to assess whether harmful TPs may form during water treatment and, if so, how to assess the impact of exposure to these water treatment TPs (tTPs) and other residues including environmental TPs (eTPs) on human and domesticated animal health through the consumption of TPs via drinking water. The types of studies or information that would be required are described while avoiding vertebrate testing as much as possible. The framework integrates the use of weight-of-evidence and, when possible alternative (new approach) methods to avoid as far as possible the need for additional testing.

Indexed as

biocidal productsdisinfectiongenotoxicitygroundwaterplant protection productsrisk assessmenttransformation products

Identifiers

PMID37644961
PMCPMC10461463
OpenAlexW4386226598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.