ReviewCureus2023
Effect of Liraglutide on Cardiac Function in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes: A Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of liraglutide on cardiac function in individuals with type 2 diabetes. The present meta-analysis aimed to identify studies testing liraglutide in individuals with type 2 diabetes. We included observational and randomized controlled trials comparing liraglutide with placebo or any other drug alone or in combination with other drugs. A comprehensive search was carried out using online databases including PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library to find relevant studies from inception to June 30, 2023, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Key terms used to search for relevant studies included "liraglutide," "cardiac function," and "type 2 diabetes," along with their synonyms and Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) terms. The outcomes assessed in the present meta-analysis included diastolic cardiac function and systolic cardiac function. For diastolic cardiac function, we assessed the E to A (E/A) ratio and the E to Ea (E/Ea) ratio. To assess the impact of liraglutide on systolic function, we assessed stroke volume in mL, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in %, cardiac output in L/min, and cardiac index in L/min/m². A total of seven studies were included, with a pooled sample size of 307 individuals (160 in the liraglutide group and 147 in the control group). The results indicated that liraglutide significantly reduced the E/A ratio (mean difference [MD]: -0.22, 95% CI: -0.38 to -0.06, p-value: 0.008) and E/Ea ratio (MD: -0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.39 to -0.12, p-value: 0.02, suggesting a potential clinical benefit on ventricular diastolic function. However, there was no significant impact on LVEF (MD: 0.46, 95% CI: -3.13 to 4.05, p-value: 0.80), cardiac output (MD: 0.05, 95% CI: -0.39 to 0.49), cardiac index (MD: 0.07, 95% CI: -0.18 to 0.32), and stroke volume (MD: -5.34, 95% CI: -14.81 to 4.12), indicating that liraglutide did not improve systolic function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.